Academy of Arts
 

Came across an unusual blog




Devoted, in general, artistic situation at the academy of arts.
Professionals comment?

Overview liked zafrendil author.

And that comment?
Pictures or text?

Very tactful review. Expect some negative evaluations, spit - is heading to otechestvennoe iskusstvo.No shown pictures already and need no comment - they are all quite strong, but Yeremeyev (which, however, have very different work - it is essentially plenerist, this here is the work of just a banal is), and Sklyarenko Kudrevatykh. May cause some objections and work with Hercules AH Kurbanov - but, you see the manifestation of postmodernism, such a formulation of a boy with a cat - did you, dear public, not like the masterpieces of world art?
It was very pleasant to see the work of a man whose work has evolved in my eyes, in the Academy - Vadim Kadzhaeva. Indeed, a worthy representative of today's galaxy of teachers (but did not know that he has a teacher). His national theme - it's not just another good reason for
monumental scale (which is held in high esteem in mylnikovskoy - monumental workshop), this is truly a celebration of a national memory of the Caucasian peoples, which the artist belongs to the (unfortunately, I do not remember, to some). This, in my opinion, better than all the adorable Savkuev (which personally I have my "found" forms and subjects all his life) has been sitting in my throat. Presented his "The Road" and the truth is good, stylish looks, sovremenno.No when he straight-away school of the academy, his creative findings seem to be a dogma.
Lovely impressionistic works in Kollegovoy and Petrov. As far as I know, Petrov also goes out of his Impressionist for decades, but the students loved him for something (I think his respect for the individuality of each student, whose work often err touch during performances of other teachers).
The Academy is also present Kalyuty cult. But it seems to work. Indeed, a powerful wizard, though a little too stuck in their decorative impressionistic portrait of his discoveries in painting.

very good review.
Nothing to add.

He wrote about it a bottle of aqua regia.

Does he know what is "aqua regia"?

Skukota!
but do not show!

More precisely - the exhibition uninteresting.
AND MAIN-nothing more :shy:> :eek:>.


In Soviet times it was interesting, in times of stagnation ;)> then at least the idea was.

The exhibition, put, boring, but the landscape Mylnikov, I suspect, preotmenneyshy.