Icon help with attribution and evaluation of icons
 

Dear atrebutirovat help evaluate and icons.

Archangel (size 30 to 26 in the gilding.)

And the icon?
(Oil, size 33 to 43)

Additional photos on request, Sorry for the quality.

Thank you all :)>

Boring academic style of the late 19th - early 20th century.

Archangel a little better.

The icon was sawdust.
This is only part of it, unfortunately.

I do not think so.

Look closely at the bottom of the icon (its cut).

I'm not expert on Icon An opportunity but to whom some of you need to pay right, because it is not about the tree cut down, but here on the edge of the lower edge of the thick coating of paint could be seen pieces of cloth, so

I :eek:>

Добавлено через 43 минуты
As for the second she was here in this salary, as in this way the Father Almighty. (15 by 18), please also evaluate, as well as photo prikriplyayu bottom of the Archangel Michael.

As for the second it was there in such a salary, as in this way the Father Almighty. (15 by 18), please also appreciate, as well as photo prikriplyayu bottom of the Archangel Michael.

For opilennuyu icon of Archangel can give 15,000 rubles , would not sawdust and in good condition - would have cost thousands of 60 - 100 , but it is already in the past. Restoration it will be about 30 000, if you make a quality gold.
World icon Exaltation of the Holy Cross - in my mind thousands of 2-3, but I do not need , in addition, it lacks some of the attributes of the icons, in particular - no halos at St. . ravnoap . Helen and St . Makarios, as well as the inscription of names of saints.

Icon of brass salary - so it is worth very little. Let 3000. But then again - I do not.