For the professional forum!
 

The last violent exchange of remarks at the forum revealed the urgent problems in the forum and put the question to the edge of the Administration:
- And what forum creators of the site built?

 The administration can still come off the erase messages, distribute ban and will explain the participants clearly its policy development forum, its future developments?
  For example, what purpose has the presence of non-core subjects? Admins or building information portal razvelekatelny "The mushrooms and music" on the background of pictures? And it will attract a lot of people, including the profile ... But this does not happen, there is no rapid growth of the forum, but there is a user who openly declare that they artbiznesu have no relationship, just communicate. The administration expects that sooner or later the user will buy a subscription AI? In vain ...
 IMHO, the non-core subjects must be banned.

One reason for the recent rapid exchange of remarks was that of the users wrote on the forum incognito, including criticism of others, ostensibly give professional advice. And now, thanks to "force" the disclosure was incognito, that not everyone is ready to listen to criticism from the user from the dropdown skill level.
What is this phenomenon in our artist-incognito? Does not disclose the name or alias creative, does not publish a track record, education, exhibitions, shows no work ... What are people doing online? and they are not one or two ..
Absolutely the same attitude and gallerist, incognito. Gallery owner money spent on advertising the gallery, and suddenly here, "a mystery" ... Do not need such gallery owners.
 I'm for the abolition policy incognito on the forum. This is a general trend of the Internet, many networks are prohibited incognito, kindly inform his real name, address, and so on, until the bank details. Do not want to look for another place, to express themselves.
 This is partly a matter of going on-we know who Vladimir Bogdanov, who is a LCR or Lucy Voronov, they have nothing to hide.
 But we all remember how incognito LCR began to accuse of incompetence.
 Why such a policy is supported by the Administration, explain, please?
Yes, be allowed to stay incognito to 50 or 100 messages, but then be so kind as to define who you are and why you're here. Personal information to be open to users with less than 100 messages.
 We all see that the current policy forum inefficient, en masse people open, experienced, respected. And who comes to replace them? Runet's not inexhaustible, replacing the departed many years to wait.
That does not appear more than once some of the Kiev gallery owners, we knew their galleries, websites, projects, and I personally knew them. To replace them came "gallerists"-incognito?
And I remember how one of Kiev galeristka saw on the forum of the young artist invited to exhibit in his gallery. I do not remember if there was a report on the forum, but the exhibition took place, I was on it.
That such an effective forum to my liking.

I do not know the site statistics and a forum Administration course of events can be completely satisfied. But I know that Runet not rubber, and many sites are experiencing an outflow of visitors to other sites. Even at the reduced Artnau number of registered participants (there are removed the participants did not confirm their activity for some time). We know that sometimes departed from the forum user organize their sites and forums.

 In light of all that is happening really want oznakomittsya that administration plans to which forum it builds and what users want to attract to the site and forum?

In my opinion is not normal in the Institute to report complete information especially bank details and address and why?
:shy:>

Gray , a forum about investment or - increasingly - the economy in the arts. Gallery owners - even incognito relevant, but here are your questions and requirements - not very.

So fast all the gallery owners who are online are logged in, calculated using two of them, lined up and organized for the exhibition hudozhnichkov from the forum , or at least supported financially by buying a couple of works - one can do without the exhibition :D>
Yes, indeed, something the administration does sat , explain why it's on the forum full of anonymous , or people with strange nicknames , this is why you check on your passport is not available ? You can and should require a credit card number is mandatory. :D>

Soon make changes to the rules ... :)>
The passport must be present at our office , credit card with a piece of paper written on a pin code to deposit the same to us ... :)>

Amused you , Seriy: What else? That is the same and so , apparently :

Hence, such gallery owners do not need you.
:)> Now let's ask the of gallerists feel they need in you, even if you lay out your passport information, credit card number though?
The answer you know?
Or do you write?

Well, once again
 

With regard to the objectives pursued , you want - believe it or - no, but we were interested to provide a comfortable platform for networking. Here's how to use it - everyone decides on its own.

For some, this tool quickly and without coordination with the wheels to publish photos of an interesting exhibition to tell the audience about the exciting developments in the art world , finding and contacting experts. Others read, but not write. Still others are engaged in squabbles and trolling with relish taking bans . People are people .

As for the real names or nicknames - each is also determined by himself . For example, I have respect for people's decision to publish under nicknames information about fakes and fraud .

In general, reasonable offers welcome. I think that political issues would soon no longer be imposed in the announcements (shame one). Tolerance for rudeness will be reduced, and so on .

By the way , for business artinvestmenta forum - not an assistant, sometimes even harmful.

What kind of websites and forums organized gone from the forum?
That's interesting.

Why (if not secret)?