The exhibition Jeff Koons at Versailles called pornographic
 

http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...escendant.html
Intrigued by the title, fumbled on the Internet. It was strange was that he saw there such?

 

More photos. In my opinion all decent, and sometimes interesting, such a blue little thing he saw in our Red October, could not see anything pornographic.

I also went to "Krachny October" and saw Koons. Speaking in the abstract, then it works exactly recognizable and original. To say that sinks into the soul forever - not. Prices? It let the crisis judge. Now Koons this descendant of Louis say thank you for drawing attention. Maybe they pals? And Koons asked for "offense" to heat up interest in himself?

The exhibition Jeff Koons
 

Yes this is vulgarity, budded violent color. People brains powder, so that all concepts are messed up in their heads. Corrupt, as they can (in the big money is invested). How it easier to manipulate people, which means - to manage. Do not have time to look around, found in a consumer society, where moral values are devalued. So.

"Modern humanity, and its mass, and its" elite ", can only run down, miss and pine from the inner emptiness. That is why it is eager to effect diversion and excitement, it looks sound, cod, bounce and nervous tickling, it requires "stimulants" - not only from the pharmacist, but also by the artist. And how many artists - they, too, the children of his age - goes towards this quest, how many invent "new art" of weary souls, or silyatsya break through to new, unusually severe irritation to give these stimuli crowd. Modern art is full of spiritual itching and arbitrary fictions, "wrote the philosopher Ivan Ilyin composer Sergei Vasilyevich Rachmaninoff in the early twentieth century. And how true it sounds today! Let us consider the same.

The word "pornography" here or figuratively, or meaningless.
But in place of the bourbon I would have protested .
No matter how much worth of Jeff Koons, they are inappropriate in these interiors, and hurt the eyes. :(>
Probably because by design , but this neighborhood is not " raising " of Koons and Versailles still debases . It's strange , I'm here , sitting in Yerevan, with great respect to the attitude of French culture and history than the organizers of the exhibition ?
In my opinion, they finished badly with his tolerance.

In general, there is pornography in Koons (healthy photographs that he "loves" his former Chichcholinu , but they did not put Versailles .

A kind of journalistic sludge . Why dragged Louis XIV? ... Parma Bourbon line was separated in the middle. The 18th century. Claim to the throne of France, they can not and Versailles to them has nothing to do . A Charles- Emmanuel 's house in Parma for about the tenth place in the inheritance . He and journalists have found each other :)>

With tolerance, you can play :D>

But with a thriving European tolerastiey have a chance to just finish badly :rolleyes:>

I did not know this word, but Google search gave a lot of curious, :D> example:

http://ltwood.livejournal.com/69763.html


and here is the story

And it's good.
This is how I see it, shows your level of communication, there is no place gopote smugly exposing his bydlyache mug for all to see and proud of its lack of culture, non-intellectual.