Your opinion on the film.
 

Shroud.
n /x.
Oil on canvas.
86 x 30 cm (icon)

Russia (?), Perhaps the XIX century.
(?).

Your opinion about the time and place the painting?

Analogues has not yet found.

Come across similar stories in Vrubel and Vasnetsov.

peals, I have this problem and to Forum Project "Christianity in» asked
be.

Christ in the tomb, despondency or humility of Our Lord, the Supreme derogation, the King of Glory - a variant of iconography of Jesus Christ, depicting him dead in his coffin.

Charles Bryulova options, Orthodox iconography, Wrobel, Greek icon.

This image of Christ was buried , the whole song repeats the Shroud of Turin . However, there is a significant difference .
In the hands of the Savior Orthodox world portrayed folded (right from top left ), whereas on the Shroud of arms crossed in the groin area .
Russian Empire , late 19th - early 20th century. Semiprofessional letter soon created a style of icon painting , not painting . Self- painting her name is probably not worth it. My opinion, this "icon" written on the canvas and the source of the work in the work of Viktor Vasnetsov , Bryulova , Wrobel and look for any other artist , perhaps, it makes no sense . I have met a similar response to the icons of St. Nicholas, St. Seraphim of Sarov.
 
Below is an example of iconographic academic writing with a similar storyline.

Near Vicenza in the monastery of Monte Berwick, as I remember, is a Russian trophy shroud the early 19th century.

But the embroidered and not painted with oil.

Cyril showed you on the recommended forum.
Here's the discussion for today:
 
first: The picture on the theme of "The Death of Christ"
Neither the shroud, the icon may not be called. There is no defining attributes: halo, inscriptions name etc. ..
In general - a strange arrangement hands of Christ.
And Christ is depicted it? Where the nails and spear
Second: And here Christ! You write that you do not see the marks of the wounds, as I write, which can be seen, noting called stigma, so what .. You write that this is not the Christ ..
first: Yes, it is not so, because the word
While the image certainly implies Christ, but explicit references to it do not.
At the same picture without question Bryullov wounds are clearly visible on both arms of the Savior
Third: Basil, one definitely can see the wound - it is between the second and third metacarpal bones, closer to the second. And on the other hand, can not see, in principle, because it is hidden.
Second: Basil, and speaking about the picture Bryullov, you mean that, because of which is suing Pevzner, or there is some other?
When talking about this, then it has a very different perspective than that provided by ...
first: Yes, of course about it.
Immediately and remembered this picture Briullov
view on the other picture, but the plot is the same.
A shroud or the icon is a recension can not remember where to be seen

Item something rare in itself.

Central , western Ukraine . 19th century. A similar letter on sale in Most likely " root" to look out there .