Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Mikhailov is good? Bad? (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=128294)

наследник 14.07.2011 20:12

Mikhailov is good? Bad?
 
Вложений: 2
Dear Sirs!
 
Caught my eye a few watercolors.
Of your choice in this case can not rely, requires an estimate of knowledgeable and understanding people.

How do you work these?
Maybe I'm lucky and someone will know this Mihaylova-79.

олег назаров 14.07.2011 21:55

It looks like it Vyacheslev Mikhailov - known Petersburg artist.

наследник 14.07.2011 22:55

Вложений: 1
Thank you, Oleg!
I also thought about it.
But style is not like - alas.

Let it be n \\ x.
What is your impression of the work?

Михалыч 14.07.2011 23:55

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir 1705883
But the style does not look like - alas.

Call?
Ask?

наследник 14.07.2011 23:59

Цитата:

Сообщение от Mikhailovich (Сообщение 1705943)
Call?
Ask?

Awkward somehow.
Most likely, it is not working, upset that from some n \\ x confused.

Михалыч 15.07.2011 00:35

I'm still familiar only with his major works, other equipment.

Михалыч 15.07.2011 16:58

Showed the work of Vyacheslav Savich.

Answer: "The work is not mine, not my signature. I was finishing graduate school of Arts and was already easily recognizable. Watercolor - never practiced."

наследник 15.07.2011 18:27

Mikhailovich, thanks, that took the trouble to clarify authorship.

Of course, it is not V.S.M.
He is a wonderful artist and have him work in the collection - great fun.

And how he appreciated the work of Mikhailov?
It's very interesting to view.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 08:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot