I do not understand!
 

Amateur - a stunning man of erudition , his every post is a useful and reliable information , the reputation is close to 3000 and very soon will be over that figure, and all the " veterans" ! Probably not glamorous enough to be numbered with "Guru" ? Even I, without a week in our year , and the "Authority" ( vnature! )
Appreciate the need of people like Amateur, they are the pride of the forum.
I am for granting him the extraordinary title of " guru " for services to the resource.

Toinen, and why is he?
He probably is not necessary.

I'm just trying to find logic!
I think that Amateur, as no one else deserves this status!

Change should be a rating system, where the measure is not the quality of communications, and the number.

He may not be necessary, but I have to, I wish to see him in this capacity!

Toinen, thanks of course.
But let things go on as usual.
Guru, not a guru - in fact, plays no role.
Authority, I'll have a couple of messages.
And the thing to gurus and so comes by itself.
"Do not multiply entities beyond necessity" (William of Ockham, 1285 - 1349).

Amateur, I just wanted to see that there are real, "Guru".

I do not mind .. but it will give, and why are we all here eto.Razve going and write messages for the sake of some "titles." Such as "Sr." or "Gurka" By moemmu opinion in the first place communication, the exchange
views, and not the pursuit of what it ranks ...

IMHO

I agree!
But as long as there is a rating system, I would like it to be adequate.

Toinen, do not worry!
These "grades" are awarded automatically for the quality and quantity of messages ..
It does not matter, flooding it (fornication) or that something sensible, and nobody knows why they ...

We are all guests on this site, as is well known in another monastery with its regulations do not climb ...

That's it!

Especially when the "Guru of seniority" to the question of attribution of writing something like:


"Nice picture, the end of the century, then say what!"