Claim Drevin
 

Friends noticed in one family so that's a job. The owners argue that this course work Drevins . My natural skepticism confront two previously acquired in the family pattern of serious authorship ( later confirmed as a serious level of expertise ).

Unfortunately we do not have the opportunity to take a job for a full investigation , I can only show these photos. I would like to hear opinions. With best regards and all the best!

Mimoprohodil, a Renin, a portrait of Rubinstein, hangs in the timing.

At first glance tezhe a sense of something he had seen . Thank you! The owners immediately sounded , I know, they say that anything close to the author's style Drevins, but trust without a murmur words of the late father-in - the collector.

Forgive my dullness, but what this course Drevin ended in 1919?
In my opinion the thing is so weak that even if it Drevin, contact her should not be

He himself in 1920 and began to teach in just-created VKhUTEMAS.
:D>

In the picture really is worth figure 09 (1908-1913 Drevin studies at the Riga City School of Drawing ), apparently shot clearly conveys. In any case, thanks for the opinions ! Purchase option was not even considered , 'm talking about other things (like buy - show ). This hypothesis also interested in the lap of the owners of authorship. Good luck!

"Course work"
 

If posoprotivlyayutsya natural skepticism :

then over time may well trigger the effect of damaged phone, and coursework was job training up , as indicated , and a small format ,
and even if so - what do you need proof - I think too , how is it interesting?

United theme.