Auction Kaupp June 4
 

Top lot was the work of Korovin (?) <!--~ 9 "-" for 80 000 euro.
Comrade Prof.
Dr.
Kühn sees no reason to assert that the signature is later, and pigments also match the specified time.
I bet disingenuous :)>

etranger, so it is possible and the picture itself and compare with known Korovinskoe roses that period.

Cyril Syzransky, think that this picture should be moved to another topic?

I would move.

In my opinion, is an obvious forgery.

I put a link to the auction.
There is much more photos, see the brush strokes and details.
It is interesting to view members of the forum.


http://www.kaupp.de/html_gb/160.html you must choose a name Korovin and open lot with this picture.

Lot 1808 and to Korovin has hardly anything to do with.
A lot number 1835 - a bad copy of the KA
Korovin's "Flowers and Fruits. Vichy" (1911) from the collection of the Kostroma Museum.

Lot 1808 as well.
Pear and orange "levitate", not planted.
Roses are not bad, but not up to Korovin.

I see that picture of far-fetched.

Korovin not!

One "expert" from the city of PA in this case would have written something like this:

"It may be Korovin, it may not Korovin. But then who could write it? Question."
 
:D> :D> :D>

He has released this picture of a kind.
By the way, she did not sell at auction.
Today, take it to the right for her subject.