Fine /original
 

Dear friends, the whole a nice day !

In the study forumskogo resource in many subjects on the attribution of paintings , experienced forum users can almost immediately determine a reproduction . In connection with this question ( possibly stupid ) - on what grounds we can conclude that this picture is a reproduction and not original ? What are the main differences between reproductions ?

Thank you for your comments !

LuDev, the question is not correct : it immediately and " reproduction "and "original . "
" Fine " is visible on one of the grounds , completely distinguishes the "original " from the copy , because the " copy called things by hand , though written by colors , and only " reproduction "refers to the picture reproduced in hard copy .

Painting , drawing . Album, with reproductions of paintings by famous artists . 3 . only units . Plays that retained in memory ( psih. ) .

LuDev, define some terminology!
(Learn mat.chast)

Toinen, defined ... thank you Cyril Syzran :) >

As I understand it , reproduction is not visible to the naked eye under good quality photos .
And here is a copy , IMHO , is the inheritance of pro ... to read Mathematics . part of the forum are likely to know very deeply author's style painting , the materials used , that is to be an expert in this field ...

Or see the earlier original, now know which copy did.

There are prints, which hudozhnichki pass with the brush that had strokes.

Very intimidated.
How, then, is to buy the picture, if not a pro?
How is the buying and selling on this forum?

And how do you buy , such as a refrigerator ? TV ? Computer ?
Perhaps ask the seller about these things, consult with a specialist , such as determined by you with the right characteristics of these subjects .

Learning to learn .. and again .. for studies such as you and set up this forum ..