Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Chatter (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=116)
-   -   Tax on the sale of works of art (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=121232)

Elrick 29.04.2011 13:25

Tax on the sale of works of art
 
Good afternoon ,

certainly is a " dupe , " but in the forehead answer to this question in the network could not be found . As far as I know, the natural person in the sale of art objects , which are in his possession for more than 3 years , the tax base does not occur , and tax , respectively, the pay is not required . Is that so?
If so , poke , please contact the relevant article and section of the Tax Code .
Grateful for the help in advance .

Sincerely ,
Elrick

Кирилл Сызранский 29.04.2011 13:33

Цитата:

Сообщение от Elrick (Сообщение 1614451)
As far as I know, the natural person in the sale of art objects , which are in his possession for more than 3 years , the tax base does not occur , and tax , respectively, the pay is not required . This is so ?

Yes it is .

Цитата:

Сообщение от Elrick (Сообщение 1614451)
If yes , poke , please contact the relevant article and section of the Tax Code .

I can not since been forgotten as useless .
Let the tax known art . its code . :D >

Added after 4 minutes
Elrick, try to look here:

Цитата:

Tax Code of the Russian Federation PART II.

Section VIII.
FEDERAL TAXES

Chapter 23.
TAX ON INCOME OF INDIVIDUALS

Article 220.
Property tax deductions


Elrick 30.04.2011 21:25

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 1614463)
Yes it is.



I can not since been forgotten as useless.

Let the tax known art.
its code.
:D>


They (tax) for certain items in its Code of know.
But this does not stop them are trying to breed suckers who do not know him)) So the question arose, and ...

Elrick 19.05.2011 18:11

Cyril , colleagues , good afternoon .

Let us , nevertheless , try to work together to clarify this issue . I do not believe that no one ( question ) is not solved earlier , in transactions of purchase and sale of works of art ...

Article 220 of the Tax Code as something very difficult to write for the legally untrained person . From some of its space to the conclusion that if you possess a thing more than three years , then selling it to anyone and do not have to ?
Thank you for your help in advance .

Sincerely ,
Elrick

artcol 19.05.2011 18:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от Elrick (Сообщение 1614451)
Good afternoon ,

certainly is a " dupe , " but in the forehead answer to this question in the network could not be found . As far as I know, the natural person in the sale of art objects , which are in his possession for more than 3 years , the tax base does not occur , and tax , respectively, the pay is not required . Is that so?
If so , poke , please contact the relevant article and section of the Tax Code .
Grateful for the help in advance .

Sincerely ,
Elrick

And with the real estate similar . Ask Realtors - me every where the same article NCs .

Кирилл Сызранский 19.05.2011 18:27

[QUOTE="Elrick; 1639793] I do not believe that no one (question) is not solved earlier, in transactions of purchase and sale of works of art ...[/QUOTE]

That was the question I'm having somewhere in the beginning.
2000's.
I explained everything and now I replied:


[QUOTE="Cyril Syzransky; 1614463]ie
since been forgotten as useless.[/QUOTE]

[size="1"]Added after 32 minutes[/size]
Oops ! Found . Not the 220th st . and Article 217 . Income not taxable ( exempt from taxation ):

Цитата:

17.1) income derived by individuals are tax residents of the Russian Federation , for the relevant tax period from the sale of residential houses , apartments, rooms , including privatized dwellings , villas , garden houses or land and interest in such property owned by the taxpayer more than three years , as well as the sale of other property owned by the taxpayer more than three years . The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to income derived by individuals from the sale of securities and income from sale of property directly used by individual entrepreneurs in business ;

Пелагея Ларина 19.05.2011 21:49

Bring your own example .
Three years ago, sold at commissary parking garage . One of the first ( old ) garage co-operatives in Moscow , but the board overcast with privatization. And at the time of the sale turned out that our property less than 3 years . In fact the family owned garage - 50 years , joining the inheritance directly to the seller - more than 10 years . Privatization of less than 3 years - hence the tax .

Tax : 125 000 p. . - nalogoneoblagaemaya base. Tax is calculated on the amount exceeding 125000 , under contract(!!! - ;)> ) , a notarized ( in my opinion is not required, but we decided that since true) .
What nalogoneoblagaemaya base today - I do not know ( like no change ) .
Principle is the same for apartments , villas and other property .

Зея 20.05.2011 02:31

Another important point! If you have income not taxable ( exempt from taxation ) from the sale of residential houses , apartments, rooms , villas , paintings , applied art , and so , necessarily, this sum must be declared . The tax on this amount of money you will not pay , but MUST specify in the declaration .

Кирилл Сызранский 20.05.2011 02:39

Цитата:

Сообщение от Zea (Сообщение 1640173)
but in the declaration MUST specify.

And if you do not specify?
Shot?
Go to jail?
:)>

Зея 20.05.2011 02:48

Penalty! (BAP) :) "Do you in fact going legalization deneh!


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 12:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot