Are you ready to fly domestic prints? Poll
 

In response to emerging recently on the forum motifs purchase lottery products (prints), please press the button and vote in the poll: Would you personally buy prints of local artists live? If yes, what size, quality and cost?
The purpose of the survey is to give a landmark on the market, whether or not to engage in prints?

You can vote by choosing, by pressing a few buttons, items, rather than one.

The term - outstanding local artists refers to artists included in the Top 20 in value, without naming specific names.

The term of popular local artists - artists with established reputations engaged in significant exhibitions and artistic life on a regular basis for over 10 years, but nevhodyaschie in the top 20.

The term "young artists, artists who have been on the market less than 10 years and participated in exhibitions and artistic life locally, EM from time to time or in the galleries of a narrow focus.

The term "print-digital or offset printing with the original signature of the artist, limited edition, numbered lists.

Thanks to all who participated in the survey!

Mb I'm wrong, but prints the artist's reputation is not important. What is important is only a picture.

artcol, price image is important (and it depends on the "reputation") ..
Remember how much Hearst prints were ..
(Recall 10 000 or so ..)

Let's not confuse two different things.
I'm not sure what Hearst called
giclee prints were even, but here at sur 'and not even giclee, and simply print.
Know what I mean?

artcol, a survey in general and not about a particular artist. Suppose you like an artist with the price of domestic oil paintings from 10 thousand dollars And if he was selling prints of his paintings, for example, on paper, A2, full-color, with his original signature on the front side, would buy them? I would have many of our artists would buy if the price was low. But do not let :-(

Hearst prints with colored skulls have been specially designed for this purpose, seal-colored foil.
It is like another option, the creation of original prints.
Poll of the print copies of pictures ... although the original is also interesting, but we have, for some reason, it is generally exotic ...

On paper would not have bought it. But would buy high-quality print (optional giclee) on the canvas.

According to Hirst - details not known, but it is clear that not just printing. You are now aware of.

Why not let - och.mnogo fuss and profit margins are not satisfied, do not know how to long tail to make money. And bold we have not yet. In the West, all the technological and development - there may be.

Seriy, you can choose to buy a print, but not all of them do.
I have a print Oleg Tistol (70h45) on the canvas, made in a single copy.
Cute :))

Yaya, glad to see you, something you rarely write ...

I would Tistol bought ... Ah ...
Why not print 1000 copies, to sit down and sign.

Let income-500 RR-500000 RR-15 thousand dollars ... Yes, it is not enough ..

Let income 2000 rubles (then the price of 3000) - 60 thousand dollars

A series of 30 pictures, 1 million 800 thousand U.S. dollars

1000 copies to sell more is necessary.

artcol, given that international stars release circulation (remember the Japanese) to 30 000 each and sold out for several scroll years ...
Amounts to imagine scary ... and not because of $ 100 ..