Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
(Сообщение 1475661)
Actually, it necessarily must be different (in size) from the originals ..
1:1 do unethical (from information-I do not remember, but I'm sure)
|
So why you wrote it, if not certain? 1 to 1 may not be copied museum items, and everything else - and ethically, and we can, and as the soul wants, if she owns the copyright holder of the image.
Posted 8 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от sur
(Сообщение 1475461)
Me with one of the artists, the promotion of which I am now starting to deal with, it was decided to manufacture replicable copies of three of his paintings before the upcoming exhibition. How to sign (on top of an existing signature on the reverse side, a marker or butter) and label (number of copies) limited edition prints? Can the size of prints vary slightly from the originals?
At what other points in the manufacture of lottery products should pay attention to?
|
Absolutely the right decision, and in general good fellow artist. Many people are afraid to go that route because of some unexplained fears (like 10 years ago were afraid to shoot photography, so as not copied someone :D).
Sign on the reverse side and give a piece of paper with an identity of authorship, bio and dr.atributami a trifle - a nice buyer.
Limited circulation in your case is meaningless, because you'll make it through the printer, rather than mechanically. So do nearly all the artists in the West: make a picture - and sell it to print. The only thing from what would be warned - from fraud and deception, as has already been written. Selling print - you're selling intellectual work, and selling a filled oil drum - a rattle for an uneducated man. Just do not do it for the sake of self-respect.
|