Cubism
 

Dear Sirs,


I would be grateful if you helped to sort out who is the author of this painting.
I have my assumptions, but I'd like to know the opinion of others.


Thank you in advance.


Sati

Sati, and you put a worse picture, then nothing from anyone you will not wait.

I apologize for the quality of my photos.
Thank you.
:o

Ibid signed Picasso.
:)

signed in Cyrillic.

Sati, and let us your suggestions obsudim.Ne so many of these Cubists have bylo.A on this hard to picture somehow.

Decided to make a "loud" opinion about it, "Pi" only in connection with attempts to sell you other work under all known naprvleniya, but with BAD PHOTO. You are not looking at the promises have not improved:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...31#post1120931
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=76841

If we take the manner of these efforts together and throw a bad version of the camera in your phone, then there is the idea of trying to divorce in a manner Ebeya.
This idea came while watching this work because She is very reminiscent of the formal modern vision of Cubism. It's like a modern artist would want to portray himself from the Italian primitives: - a la depict possible, but in their heads is no longer zalezesh, while another, so that leaves only a la.

From Cubism early 20 th century also took time, present-day brains. Hood. changed. Therefore, the work looks formally ebeevskoy. And the photo quality on the contrary are not shielded from this, and provoking analogy.
And in conjunction with your other attempts, suggests a search dupes, or probing the soil to improve the "creation" or attribution, and the subsequent search of these simpletons.
I do not blame the creative search of money, but also prostetski, soft (this forum) said. Must read books about successful fellow there all the techniques described. Why this rusish-gag.

If participants recognize in this picture of someone very great wonder. Then lay out even a homemade photo camera.

Fed, I, too, the impression formed.

Agreed.
That's how it looks.
Most likely the author of this work "work" under Ivan Puni.
Even the signature of "PI" looks as an association, although Puni so did not sign.

So they have achieved what they wanted.