Socialist realism - this is our antiques
 

Socialist realism - this is our antiques.
Another, not really ...

My God, it's awful, then what?

"And guys, do not know!" (C)

In addition to social realism was " postavangard " 20- 40's, Underground ( "other art") , "left MOSH " and " severe style ", sponsored by the Manege resounded for " formalizm " Comrade . Khrushchev, who then did no one could be called " socialist realism ." :)>

And so from the perspective of art investment, social realism , I'm afraid there is little interest, so now you can, roughly speaking , to take a couple of Shtukar and move on to the wall for 4-5 Clent so long . , And even there the price of this will be five years from now (I'm afraid to talk about ten years :)>) - now do not guess, but as for me , socialist realism is not an investment in the arts.

You, our antiques :)>

This topic, we have somehow worked through the forum. The term social realism wrong , let alone severe style does not hold water , as the term person of Caucasian nationality. A little harsh faces , colors are not too bright and harsh here stil.vse these postavangardy , non- isms, the left and right of Moschus, all of this is social realism , te art of the Soviet era .
And for me the art of the Soviet era is a very important part of the art world , I would even venture to say the most interesting thing in the 20th century . While this is a swear , and we will have these wretched antique shops, which has just unpleasant zahodit.Iz for pictures that are out there are exposed every year the same thing, and the people there became more artificial, which is wet .

Mozhee you consider what you will, but there is such a term in the Soviet Union more than 50 years he was the only artistic method:
No, it's not.
Moreover, a large number of artists, as we now know, there were no Soviet artists and artists of socialist realism in contrast, were supported by the state.
This content, Samvel, was related at all to the quality of painting these artists, namely, the direction: the socialist state podderzhivlo and contained solely " art of socialist realism ".
And it is understood that "other art" is not supported and is not paid, nonconformists were margialami and survive as best they could and knew how.

Yes, discussed, but something itching ... Do not splashed with water, baby?

Fear - which, combined with socialist realism, a reflection of the same processes.

Added after 3 minutes
In general, yes, the same opinion and I come ... Ie blankly at the stylistic features of the draw, we must look deeper ...

Postavantgard - it separately, and the rest can be divided into positive and critical social realism, because the process fencing [/URL] had already been completed.

Would look interesting exhibition where all the domestic art of the Soviet era would have been presented in a single exposure, and not in different rooms, as well as a dialogue of works ...

Well, if Deineko, Pimenov, Gerasimov considered social realism , the good price and good investment. And they will only growth, of course.

And at the " severe style " prices too good at the moment - for the heirs and for investors.
Also not reduced for 10 years .

This is when " severe style " good as Socialist Realism.

Yes, even a talentless Nalbandian - watch out how much it costs ...

That's it, that artists can not get away . Were.

Andronov, add more .

Of course, this lapidary Wait all overfed , plus a lot of garbage , it distorts ...

I honestly do not understand - the American pop art is essentially different from Brodsky , for example?

1) Brodsky was.

2) Brodsky was able to draw.

But:

3) Brodsky was insincere, and pop art - sincere.

4) Brodsky himself sketched, and pop artists use ready chandeliers.