Modern /Contemporary Russian Art
 

Thank you, really strange looks Pepperstein inappropriate.

I liked Suetina Lumberjack and peasant woman with a rake, and Christmas in the previous message.

It is difficult to agree with you . Pepperstein , I think , does not drop any plastic or conceptually . In the theme of " mutating utopia , " he not only looks like a foreign body , but more than that - it 's just one of the few serious followers of " total utopia . " Despite the ironic context of his utopia , the nature of his irony , I think , from the discharge , about which we can say that "in every twist of irony there . " It's like poetry Kibirov heroic times " Message Rubinstein " - they all seemed to thoroughly ironic , but inside sits a longing for authenticity . " In this sense , say , there probably would have been inappropriate , Oleg Yakovlev and his postmalevichevskim cycle .

I like Pepperstein , though somehow less . :) " But his work is shown in the collection does not look like a sequel, more like an imitation of a far-fetched literary component . And speaking of irony , then Oleg Yakovlev it much more, maybe even too much . :) >

And here I can not agree with you. Pepperstein, in my opinion, is radically different from the artists of "total utopia", which are conceived primarily plastically, while he visually represents the literary idea, as befits a self-respecting conceptual :)> :)>
Roughly speaking, Pepperstein can not watch enough to tell you about the pictures on his mobile phone. Nor Malevich, nor Christmas, nor Suetina by phone can not tell, they should look.

Perhaps we simply have different understandings of the meaning of the phrase "mutating utopia," but I'm in my interpretation of it is repelled from an understanding of names like the idea of ​​the exhibition. And in this context Pepperstein with its "literariness" - very appropriate figure of a "mutation total utopia" is basically just as literary. Christmas and Suetin - a figure of "correct" ie plastic development and Pepperstein - namely, "mutation". As for irony, then, of course, the Yakovlev (here you are absolutely right) too much of it, simply put - it is not ironic but almost parody. At the same Pepperstein irony is much less, because it is basically serious (although it seems that he nasmeshnichaet), this is pure utopian. That was my thought.

I do not know, do not know how long trying to make up a story about Pepperstein, but failed. Apparently either the narrator of my nevazhnetsky or Pepperstein not so simple, how do you malyuete :)>

Here's how to reveal the name of the event by its founders:



Thus pillar of the exhibition is Pepperstein, etc. fastened to it.

In my opinion, it would be interesting to interpret the Russian avant-garde in the language of ancient Greek sculpture. :)>

Between them , generally speaking, have more in common than might appear . Both phenomena are basically appealing to the ideal . Moreover the domain of ideal and fact , and the other is the central point , without which neither incomprehensible avant-garde , nor drevnegrech . sculpture . Both are not particularly interested in literary ( read - the story ), part art . Both actually negumanistichny ( not to be confused with antigumanistichnostyu ), ie, man as such may be interested in them only as a means of expressing the ideal . And the fact that the avant-garde and Greek . Mythology in fact , primarily kosmogonichny , so it does not require proof.

And what is the seriousness of this is stated?
Can ...
Hmmm ...
formulated?

Juggling symbols and postmodern irony, not more.
A whole galaxy of jugglers represented in the collection art4.

Or (whisper) there and tell you something nothing special - just do not tell anyone!
:D>

Comparison of the archaic (Greek) and avant-garde total utopias - productive theme, - just because of their incomplete "isomorphism". Greek "negumanoidnost" richer, which is why the inverse with respect to the interpretation of peppershteynovskoy and appeared to me more interesting - and ironic at the same time and sureznee "if you want (Yes, the ideal here and there, but fundamentally different. In the ancient tradition of homo still glimmering in the early morning fog, but this hazy image is already warmed by the human warmth, which is to occur, and in the vanguard of cosmogony is its radical "removal", the fruits of which we have the pleasure to enjoy. I do not think that, being guided by the compass of the vanguard, humans get out of the deep are .. .).