Valentin Vorobiev of the artists of the sixties
 

Spied on in the diary Vadim Alexeev (http://alexvadim.livejournal.com/152687.html)

Post it sounded like this:
How should I write about art
In The Mirror "- a chapter from a new book by Valentin Ivanovich Vorobiev,
sharp and precise as the surgeon's scalpel, the portraits of the sixties:
Weisberg http://magazines.russ.ru/zerkalo/2010/35/7vo.html
Belyutin http://magazines.russ.ru/zerkalo/2010/35/10vo.html
Kuzminskii http://magazines.russ.ru/zerkalo/2010/35/9vo.html
Grobman http://magazines.russ.ru/zerkalo/2010/35/8vo.html
Steinberg Zelenin http://magazines.russ.ru/zerkalo/2009/33/vo9.html

This seems to be from a new book, which is preparing to leave in a UFO. But someone says that there are similar memories of his high-profile "public enemies". "Enemy", by the way, it is difficult to find - all sold out.

There.
We have to check.

But, of course, such politically incorrect memories he brought himself out of society, so to speak.


Although the memories, of course, very interesting.

A month ago, bought the book "Enemy of the People, in phalanx on Tverskaya.

Price literary success. As the documentary thing nobody takes, but read in one breath. In php.ini blotted went for broke. And the author is full of self-irony - it is valuable in our times.

Read the chapter about Veisberg. That's funny.
This he did name-calling and Iofan Chernikhov?

Despite the fact that neither of the two towers and have not built ...

It is documented by the intonation. And so it was, in the sense of how to treat each other in this circle ... style all respects different from ... Not for nothing out there with great irony is cited, for example, Okudzhava - "... so as not to divide one by one, few of them were interested in art (in its highest sense). As people were cynical, and in his personal life and that did the art ... This is reflected in these texts ... (As always, there are exceptions).

After reading his first book, I decided to meet him, he found his phone, phoned, met, we walked to the Luxembourg Gardens ...


But Comrade Valentin Vorobiev and remains a mystery to me personally ...

Anatoly, Valentin Vorobiev is a real sleaze and all, what other comments?

Added after 8 seconds
Anatoly, Valentin Vorobiev is a real sleaze and all, what other comments?

I read his first book with mixed feelings. The narrator, I must say, did not cause any sympathy (rather the opposite). Had a feeling that many of its features are dictated by the envy of the unit. At the same time, did not pass the feeling that in many cases, although he is tough, but very precise way, and is often envious look.

There is nothing about art is not written there - about human relations, which began to take strange forms, often almost ugly ... Talented people are actually lost in this environment. On the surface came out (of them), only those who were for whatever reasons, some other interesting and answered, often by chance, to those interests. For example, there was a political necessity "to move left art" and were immediately selected and displayed on the left-most famous exhibitions and the strangest artists. a genius or not ... there were many things to do ... Around this situation spun many who want to catch your fish ... That seems to me that this author is noticed.