|
Fake Goncharov
Press Centre in Moscow rigged in Art: Russian experts to protect creative work by Natalia Goncharova
© RIA Novosti. Valery Melnikov16: 00 26/04/2011Novy Hall Press conference on the topic: "rigged in art: Russian experts to protect creative work by Natalia Goncharova," in connection with the release of new foreign editions of the works of the painter, graphic artist, theater Natalia Goncharova. In 2011 in England and France saw the light of two books devoted to the works of Russian artist-avangardistki Natalia Goncharova (1881-1962). Authors of monographs entitled "Natalia Goncharova" and "Natalia Goncharova: her art between tradition and modernity" - Andrew Parton and Ms. Denise Bazetu. According to Russian experts, these publications brush Goncharova attributed to a large number of works of unknown and sometimes dubious origin. On what issues raised in the expert community edition of these volumes will be discussed at a meeting with reporters. The press conference will be attended: - Acting Head of Rosokhrankultura Viktor Petrakov; - Director General of the State Tretyakov Gallery Irina Lebedeva; - Deputy Director of the State Russian Museum Evgenia Petrova; - Well-known collector Aven; - London-based collector and gallerist James Butterwick; - Representatives of the museum community, experts and collectors. |
Alternative Goncharov
Andrew Sarabyanov wondering where British counterpart found so many hitherto unknown works of the great Russian avangardistki
Let us imagine: in Moscow, goes a monograph on the great English painter William Turner, written by famous Russian art historian N. In this monumental edition published many works by artists from various museums in the world. But the book carries a sensation: it has played dozens of new works of the great Englishman. Yea, they were unknown not only to the general public, but even the experts. Today - thanks to the publication - they were made public, which, of course, was delighted with the amazing discoveries. After all, most of them - and there are real masterpieces, revealing new aspects of the works of the great masters - for many years was kept in private collections (mostly Russian) and did not appear at numerous monographic exhibitions of the artist. Some of these works belongs to the William Turner, located in the city of Little Ovsyansk and registered in Switzerland. It is difficult to imagine the wonder and the joy brought out books from the British critics, and connoisseurs of Turner. One can assume some fierce competition arose between the British museums just for the opportunity to purchase newly discovered works. Sensation! However, jokes aside.
Читать дальше...
Discussion on the channel "Culture" In the noble family of textbook, and therefore very expensive art museum, there was a scandal: in England and France in this year's monograph, dedicated to the works by Natalia Goncharova. And it turned out that most of the works which are published in these books and are attributed to the well-known habit Russian avant-garde, her hands do not belong. In solid form in editions of works of great artists are given a fake, with all the ensuing
Читать дальше...
|
In Moscow, talking about fake Goncharova
Вложений: 4
April 26, the Russian News and Information Agency RIA Novosti press conference on the theme: "A rigged in Art: Russian experts to protect creative work by Natalia Goncharova. The reason for the meeting served as a fake work included in the publication of the life and work by Natalia Goncharova.
Читать дальше...
A press conference was held with great emotional incandescence, and appeals to the experts to do something, responded P. Aven, who announced that all we all know (who would doubt his knowledge!): And who makes a fake, and who sells. He said that there is a stable group of international crooks who are in France and Switzerland, and that their names he now does not name for legal reasons. These criminals have hired Parton and Bazetu to legalize their counterfeit. The publication of these books - one of the steps in this direction. Ebenezer himself checked false provenance of paintings and personally made sure that all out. Verify the authenticity of fake paintings will not be difficult: they are all painted in our time, and any technological expertise immediately identify it. Aven says that it is considering the issue of initiating criminal prosecution of fraud in France, where the laws in this area are very strict, and suggested that the state represented by Rosokhrankultura and the Ministry of Culture to participate in this matter. This initiative was immediately supported by the acting head of Rosokhrankultura Viktor Petrakov. Present at the press conference, James Butterwick, said that rang a publisher who published these books, in order to inform about the situation, but the response was: they trust Professor Parton. This reaction, unfortunately, reflect the situation. Why did this become possible gross fraud? Why they are not afraid of the reaction from Russia? Because the credibility of our expertise in the West too is not perfect. First, in mid-November 2010, in light of a book Parton, and almost immediately on the forum ARTinvestment.RU signal appeared about how terrible it is packed full of fakes. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...&postcount=306 In the near future, we, the editors AI, will post all the fake pictures of these monographs. Constantine Babulin, A http://artinvestment.ru/invest/fakes...ntcharova.html |
Цитата:
Letter from Director General of the Tretyakov Gallery in publishing «Antique Collectors Club» on the book by E. Parton , " Natalia Goncharova » May 18, 2011 Director General of the State Tretyakov Gallery, Lebedeva IV sent a letter to the publisher «Antique Collectors Club» on the book by E. Parton , " Natalia Goncharova" . Read more http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...pismo_gtg.html |
International Confederation of antique and art dealers in Russia and CIS ( MKAAD ) to protect heritage Natalia Goncharova
ARTinvestment.RU - 28.06.2011, 10:26 Цитата:
Now translate the article about the exhibition Goncharova in the Czech Republic, where the police came after they read the article of our site. |
Цитата:
:)> |
Natalia Goncharova: The war for truth or for money?
In all well-known "cold" war, in which foreign and grabbed our homegrown experts, supported by influential officials such as Director of the Tretyakov Gallery, the result of a long wait, if at all.
In words, both parties are opposed to fake Russian avant-garde works, sweeping the art market. In fact, Western authoritative experts "on Goncharova" make a real and strong steps, producing a monograph for the other. And what museum workers have answered? TG announced its fund works Goncharova hundreds of oils and many thousands of works on paper published several local exhibition catalogs - or in conjunction with Larionov, or together with other Russian avant-garde Amazons - Exter and Rozanova. In announcing the presence of the directory Bazetu "60-70%falshaka" Irina Lebedeva put itself at least embarrassing, but rather - in a ridiculous position. Accusing the authors of both directories to non-professional approach to the attribution of the published pictures, Lebedev has identified itself is not perfect professionalism, not based on proven research and objective evidence but on unfounded allegations, for which it in the West along with other members pristnopamyatnoy press conference can be quite easy to pull to court. I assure you that before you take a book into print and the authors and the publisher have undertaken a thorough legal review of its potential liability in the event of lawsuits. I know it well from my own experience, including by not sweet. And for sweet, too. Especially considering the many revelations of so-called Russian so-called expert critics, whose authority in the West is close to no. And we have new rich who buy masterpieces, Western experts often do not know and need to "give me Rybakov," or "give me Sarabianov with Pospelov."
Читать дальше...
|
strange that this topic is not a hot debate. in fact, Western experts are trying to prove that they know the Russian artists who are better than they are known in Russia. If the answer to this challenge will not be loud , then followed by Goncharova for many other artists and art market will be greatly undermined.
|
strange that in Russia react to small that define Western books that almost nobody saw , and the activity Jafarova , Turchin, Basner, Valyaeva etc. do not pay attention .
When Russ put on display "In terms of Malevich's " fake Lissitzky, outraged the public is an art ? |
I really wonder how all came to public discussion.
Well, got a book with fakes, someone protested , he replied, " What prove ? Do you own one ?". And the discussion goes smoothly to a standstill. Who is going to seriously discuss the examination of a photo? A consultation with a research question has fallen hard for a picture , and are expensive and large nobody wants (the owner of the picture is not necessary because, without consultation , he published the original owner of the work, the author of books even more so not necessary, but criticism is not necessary, because public scandal troublesome , expensive technological research thing , and that he ? most want? he warned friends and that's enough ). So I really wonder who was the initiator of this conference? |
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 09:39. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.