Trinity Rublev /Sad news from the Tretyakov Gallery
 

"... obeying someone else's idiotic whim" - called the patriarch idiot is not the best tone for a specialist on ancient art.
however, the User of constantly resorting to cheap tantrums and inspirational metaphors: "... tie round grenades and tp

now enough restoration experts in the spiritual dignity of, including among the monks, to comply with all procedures for preservation of the icon.

ottenki_serogo, you're right.
Rublyovskaya "Trinity" exhibited Crimean shaft, the exhibition "Europe-Russia-Europe" in the summer of 2007-pontovatsya before foreigners can, and in the temple can not be transported to Moscow, can and can not be 30 km.
Conditions on the Crimean shaft are the same as in any church .. crowd, such as temperature, etc.

In order not to offend anyone tell tolerate: I think here the question is broader and it is about pop olizah.

anti-Christian, antipravoslavnoe vozvanie girlfriend and I will not mention.

"Trinity" - is primarily an icon, and then a work of art, a masterpiece and so on. Icon to the church, and especially "Trinity" in the Trinity-Sergius Lavra can not be bad.

If this icon in his time not treated as a work of art, we are now is a work /icon is not seen b.. How much already. This is an old argument, it refers to the icon. Believers its approach, the art-its.
But I want to remind the faithful that we have 5%, the strength of 10%.
A "Trinity" Andrei Rublev, a national treasure, and not the property of the priests.

Is it really so little? From these figures, Cyril?

Cyril, what kind of logic? robbed the church, within which these works were created, and now they say: "You spoil, we will not!
Attach the situation to his collection or other property, whether this holds true?

Who percentage - the big question, but in this case it is irrelevant.

surprised judgments of the forum - people seem to be "not far" from the art ... "Icons in the church can not be bad" - but about the candles, soot, hundreds of people during the service? you know? about that, what route we have to Sergiev Posad?
Or there about the fact that conditions on the Crimean shaft - the same as in any church? You often go there? devices that monitor temperature and humidity conditions, see?
As for LJ-nick - why is it "hysterical", or even if it was true, what attitude is his personal "anti-clericalism "???? Yes, let him at least three times likes or dislikes the ROC, it is important first of all what he says about the icon and its position as a specialist?
Well, of course, that can understand the scientific researchers and restorers of the Tretyakov Gallery ....

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
why, excuse me, the ROC must do something to return, while others do not? her alone, that I "robbed" ... let's make restitution and return all the previous owners (in this case, their heirs)? see, what then of the museum collections will ...

By the way, you know, where in six months then will all these "returned values"? Yeah, auctions ...

How to count. If a census, there every-Orthodox. 85%, it seems. A 5-10%, it is still a lot of it on holidays in the churches say. You yourself can multiply the number of churches in the number of parishioners and to compare these hundreds of thousands of people.
Now all Denominations problem-no one in the churches serve. Build something built, but the people something and no. The people there and no money. Priests really do not have, as before. Began to look all over the place running. Who wrote books, who tracks who breeds bees (in rural areas) to feed the family ...
On the TV, then everything is OK, but in reality, things are not really a fountain, sorry for the freestyle in this thread, I'm not religious, I am forgiven.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
And others say that the Church is robbed for centuries. Farmers in progolod hundreds of years and humped on the bar, and the priests. But still praying for paternal zapreshali (split), the people in the taiga corners of the priests and the authorities 400 years buried.

How can we so adamantly tried, not specialists?
On the one hand is the icon of the ethereal, penetrating beauty, whose place in the Temple
the other is a national treasure, which, if you believe what is written in the article is in extremely bedstvennoi condition, and because it was displayed on the Crimean shaft, no argument: the more one shipment can not stand ...
My opinion is that the icon of a place in the Temple, but the last word for professionals in this case.

I think that applies. I do not want to live according to church law of three priests and five old women.
And I want to live a normal secular laws.
So we come and to paranzhi and to ban meat in position to sell ...

With all due respect to you, not politically correct.
And to live by secular laws, that neither you nor anyone else no one will ever ban. To believe or not believe is a personal choice of each.

I etogo-politkorrektno/ne politically correct do not understand.
For example, I do not like it that Muslims slaughter sheep in a mosque in the city center of things in shops and markets selling pork, and someone else, that the Jews in matzo add ... there really think of themselves ...
Complex is the question for me, politically correct, not politically correct ...