Evaluation and Attribution
 

Zdravstvuyte.Bolshaya please help in identifying the author and the possible cost of operation.

Oil on board 13 on 20sm.Podpis in the lower right uglu.Rabota acquired in 1950g.v g.Leningrade.Prinoshu apologize for the poor quality photo (work under glass). I would be grateful for any information.

signed as Lagorio (Leo Feliksovich)

Miniature painting to judge from the monitor is not easy.

Maybe someone from the specialists on this artist will tell.

Somehow I am skeptical of such "rustic" Questions for a shopping site, like-"Oh, shozh is it?". When immediately clear that this is a very expensive artist Lagorio Lev.

   This simplicity suggests the suspicion of a possible manipulation. Especially with the exact, where the work is purchased.
 What exactly can consist of manipulation, not sure.
But do not think it's a coup. Especially do not think so after reading the opinions of renowned experts from the Hermitage in St. Petersburg on the availability of graduates of the Academy, where production of various artists.

Do not want anything bad to say about your picture, but a devious probing I do not like.

In the picture (the frame) has a plaque with an inscription indicating goda.Kartina was donated by my grandmother to my grandfather in 1950.

No need to provide information on the pieces, sfotkayte and shows. But without high-quality photograph of the painting is no normal response will be.

Clouds is quite similar to the sky in the painting "View of St. Petersburg moonlit night" in 1875, but the picture seems written later.

Generally taken great; me somewhat confused cracelures, something I do not remember them in the pictures Lagorio; painting technique he respected and wait where you have everything dries out.

Here, of course, one could argue that the sketch was written in one session, then cracked.
Maybe so.

Generally speaking, in my opinion, Lagorio wrote several drier, always pulling the line, and indeterminate spots to write - I do not remember.

A ship something in the background - as if torpedoed and sank ...

and here and there :D

This is the captain abruptly pulled the handbrake on himself.
:D

Pure bullshit!
The work of the European average artist.

Many thanks for mneniya.Nesmotrya made on categorical judgments distinguished ANTIKa in the near future will try to put better foto.Hotelos to hear the views of other experts on the origins and authorship raboty.Trebuetsya whether expert or opinion ANTIKa absolutely verno.I another issue (for common Development): In what year did the Soviet Union could appear fake works of this artist?

On the origin of emails you, my grandmother bought in Leningrad, and authorship inscribed in the corner.

But this picture brings extra spice because of clashes of experts:
The first deputy director of the Tretyakov Gallery:
 "Let's bring expert painting of a Dane, signed by the same Lagorio. The both of 1863. The artist used the same colors in Europe. And no chemist here will not prove anything. Conduct an examination, he would say only that the language used in the dyes or their components have been adopted in the mid-nineteenth century. We are talking mainly about the forgeries of paintings of the nineteenth century. "
According to experts, Vladimir Petrov, the album "The Lion Lagorio", released by respected publishing house "White City", about thirty (!) Paintings belong not Lagorio, and Danish, German and French painters! And on this album with students, art historians, totally unsuspecting trick. If only the creators of "Catalogue of counterfeit works of art" did not occur to rummage in the archives of the European auctions and did not find complete analogues of these "Lagorio, overweening hype would have surfaced."

And suddenly you have a genuine Lagorio and it will become a reference for the examination. In the genre of black humor, take the examination at the Tretyakov Gallery, and then Vladimir Petrov.

P.S. Forgot to clarify what the disassembly-Tretyakovka navydavala "erroneous" conclusions, and "Catalog ..." pointed it out, and one of its drafters, Petrov, an expert of the Tretyakov Gallery and honestly of the errors and for themselves, became independent from the former and the Tretyakov expert.

I think not.


Written brilliantly, in my opinion.

I agree that shit ...

Good evening.
Today I tried to make a better picture, unfortunately glass is nevozmozhno.Sdelal photo autograph and inscription on the back side (3960r.i N125). The frame is the inscription in pencil: 13/20 (but it is almost not visible).
Again, the picture is in our family (in Leningrad-St Petersburg) with 1950g.Neuzheli and then forged paintings by Lev Lagorio?
I think the time was not quite appropriate, people were more honest, and prices of art have been others ...
Interestingly any opinion about the painting is valuable any information.

Добавлено через 6 минут
Pecheneg

If not difficult, justify your opinion.

Pecheneg

If not difficult, justify your opinion.