Single feature ranking
 

Hello, dear colleagues!
In this forum, frequently asked questions about the directory, "One Art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/index.htm

I think that would be helpful if I will participate in the forum and to the best of their abilities and rights (a very limited <!--~ 2 "-"), executive secretary of the Rating center of trade unions of artists will answer your questions.

Surely you have and suggestions on the ratings of artists. I undertake to transmit to destination in the rating area with necessary comments.

The only request: to clothe and supply issues in a civilized form ;) "But I thought that rudeness on this forum is not <!--~ There is 1 ~ ->

Here are some basic options:
Guidelines for determining the rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm
Archived:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ4.htm
The new project "International art rating:
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
Internet project "10000 best artists in the world" (based on the ratings):
http://painters.artunion.ru/best.htm

Olga Ozolin, this issue was already raised at the forum. Maybe it makes sense to combine the two themes into one with a broader context, ie discuss this topic has not a single "unified artistic rating, while all the ratings, which fall into the hands? Comparing the different ratings, you can more effectively identify their particular strengths and weaknesses.

The tone of discussion in the topic does not suit me. I was not interested in general opinions about the EXP, had heard for 11 years and praises, and curses, and slander ((((
EXP is already in the institutes are held, what is the point to discuss it in general?

Just if something can be useful in the sense of explaining some specific things, glad to help.

Explain please what downgrades artists?

In my opinion, a normal tone.

Added after 5 minutes

As soon as you have decided to discuss and answer questions about the EXP at the forum, then get ready to listen to different opinions. Everyone comes from his understanding and he not know what you "been listening to for 11 years." Different people - different opinions.

Clearly, we seek ..

I am interested in two specific things: what is said above danvik, on what principle is downgrade artists? And second, how is it that the artist change the drive letter (for example, with "A" to "B")? For example, a "2A", became the "2B". How can such changes occur, if the artist is long dead, but his musical legacy has long been known professional community, and therefore any factors that could significantly affect the re-evaluation of his legacy, can not be? From which emanate the drafters of EXP in these cases?

(Sorry if off topic.)
 

In the spring found the site "artnet".

Liked it.
Went through .. (Many naryla interesting) ..

I go in late September and find that information on the sales of those artists that I issued in the spring, will no longer be issued (for some reason) ..

Who knows.
why and how it works (which determines) ..

Thank you.

Throw in slot $ 30 for 30 days and begin popping up artists.

NATA NOVA, you subscribe free?

No, I'm free pop up, and now comes out that 0 sales (and in spring it was ..)

For example, Lisa Yushkenazi spring were painting (sales through auctions) and now the only info about the schedule ...
Or this information is kept only a certain time? Then what does it depend on time? From that Salat is a gallery which sold for membership in ARTNeT?

Or call and ask what's what?
All I wonder ...

Go to site artnet relations have not, but about a downgrade there are 2 reasons.

1-I: the artist is losing popularity. This does not happen within a year, but over the decade is even felt. Example: Many of the sixties, which in the wake of perestroika, were built almost in the rank of classics, and now have taken a completely normal place in the second row. And many full members of the Arts, which after death are forgotten by the public immediately, and experts, too, unless the profile (well, not writing, for example. An art of social realism, so he will remember this artist, unless recalled).

However, with categories A and B. Which of metamorphosis with many artists come, and the most famous! Than it was 30 years ago and what was ... (Not naming names because I'm here are not under the nickname, and no right to offend anyone). Market relations, understand (((((
And our perception is changing. Its very interesting to older releases EXP track itself is sometimes notice))

2-I am the cause. In the history of EXP were several serious global revisions, the last one was in connection with the creation of MHR:
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
When the rankings came Picasso and Tiepolo, a lot had to be revised. And by the way, this is a whole, in my meniyu, went EXP benefit.

They must have received a category "5 G".
:D :D :D

This joke has been more years 11ti))))

Was still a wonderful poem Meylanda on a similar theme:

ON THE OCCASION ratings of old and new MASTERS
XVIII-XX centuries

Commemoration of the Dead -
Good work, gentlemen.
None of them really do not vozropschet,
They do not harm the rating.

But about the living, is perhaps worth
Check all a hundred times,
Not something like an animal, the creator of howl,
Or, as a child, the tears from my eyes

Dip mournful page
Where he is mentioned in the "6-B,
And it is no doubt
In his tragic fate.

(2000)

Olga Ozolin, he has a lot of ranking.

artist's life is harsh,

Gallery owner went "cool" ...

Rating - a true basis

To trade beauty! (c) :D