Turzhansky it?
 

Lord experts!

[COLOR=\\

[QUOTE=\\

??

[/QUOTE]
The label just stuck davno.Prikleena gum arabic used in painting binder for dry pigments, and in everyday life - as an adhesive for paper and cardboard from the gum (acacia condensed juice or some fruit trees such as cherry, plum, apricot). Gum crush into powder and diluted with warm water to the consistency of liquid cream.
After drying, darkens, and eventually spots of glue becomes more contrasting.

It seems that Turzhansky, and that Chelyabinsk was written later.

And I ineteresno whose estate?

[QUOTE=\\

I also like very much.
I could really write exactly the same for another family member.
The more details (a branch of the sticks in the window), they differ.

It is not enough for mazisto Tourjansky?
Well, when the files were not up to mazistosti.

In general. I personally do not cause suspicion, at least, in my opinion, it is written better than Leonard Viktorovich.

Repeats large successful works - this is a very common food for most professional artists.
The degree of impasto - a question like that. There is a signature and a number of other items available for technical studies, these tests will remove half of the questions. If the signature on-wet, if a set of pigments and painting and other elements all right - style will discuss separately.
Good roads of all the technical questions should answer confidently and without alternative. If not - let the risk of someone else.

I consider it necessary to decipher all the inscriptions, etc. There are very interesting cases.

I can not judge which one is the real Turzhansky, but the work is, in my opinion, do different hand.
At the museum - a slender track, as shown in - somehow not glued, porch generally deployed and waddle. Also - just opinion.

[QUOTE=\\