Attribution object silver with enamel
 

Please antiques experts, help assess the authenticity of the subject. If it is possible for the photo - who, when it was made and whether the value? Ryazan. Thanks!

Hallmarks: 88 samples of "female head in the right head-dress and codes of Moscow assay control wizard" DF. Russia, Moscow, workshop Fedor Rückert, gold and silversmith, prominent enamel, 1908-1917gg. Feodor Rückert worked for Faberge firm, O. Kurlyukova, I. Marshak. The subject is made in the difficult technique of multicolor painted enamels on filigree with subtle color transitions from one color to another, in the color scheme typical of Fedor Rückert.
On the authenticity do not judge.

enamel
 

Spasibr you very much! And do not advise, how do you know about the authenticity or get an expert opinion? Where to go and how to know the approximate value of the subject??

And why Moscow trial?
Do not shop Ryukkerta in St. Petersburg was?

 
Ryukkert worked for the Moscow branch of the company in 1887 - 1917 years.

Indeed, the workshop Ryukkerta was in St. Petersburg,
hence the objects they made there and make their way.
 Where they are - another question.
 IMHO - this is a remake.

I will not try to say, photographs, remake or not.
But the issue is much broader and deeper than many think.
Who cares in general for Fedor Ryukkerta:
http://ruckert.narod.ru/index.htm
and for the hallmarks here (also in general):
http://ruckert.narod.ru/p286.htm

In recent years, the life of FI Ryukkert lived in Moscow for Vorontsovskaya street 23, in Moscow as he died, was buried at the cemetery.

I beg your pardon, but the woman's head looks not right, and left?
Then, this is another period

sant1823, leftist at 101%!

Separately, on stamps, is the head in the headdress, it looks right.

On all sides head:
  over the stigma of looking to the right, but the stamp itself and left.

The authenticity of the stigma attributed to - zero.
Made by young professionals who do not possess the due knowledge, which are beyond the knowledge of manufacturing techniques.
The thing is, of course, has value.
The biggest - for a foreigner in a doorway.
The truth Kasimov foreigners almost never.
I think so.

As I understand it, you will be more interested in making money, not the authenticity of the product.
Simply we have different approaches.
I last slesaar-tool-5 grade, who received a second degree in this specialty.
Therefore, I see technological mistakes, but ...
Mindful of fair comment Metalist (no need to disclose errors to forgery did not sophisticated), I do not elaborately explain all the mistakes producers of this product.
If it is viewed in terms of art, it is a typical example of oil oil. Reloading decorations, leading to eclecticism. Excluding the period under which made forgery.
Again, a thing made of young professionals, and very good, but illiterate.