Volkov, Efim E.?
 

Both pictures are purchased together in 1981 without signatures - the canvases are circumcised.

"Autumn Gold" - oil on canvas, 49h71, frame - not "native", oil on canvas old, scree, scrapes, breaks, dark varnish.
One of the variations of the famous paintings "in October 1993, Art. Siverskaya (TG). Such a variation ("Autumn Gold") - on pre-revolutionary postcards publisher Richard.

"Autumn Sunset" - oil on canvas, 65h81, old canvas without a stretcher attached to the right is not "native" frame buttons and cardboard boxes, scrapes, breaks, dark varnish.
Such an arrangement I have not found, but similar in style and place: "Autumn" 1897; "spring" 1890 (Nizhni Novgorod Art Museum), as well as variations of these works.

Maybe I'm wrong, your opinion?
P.S. Images without color correction.

Honestly, I would never have thought that these pictures and
 "October 1883, Art. Siverskaya "drawn from the State Tretyakov Gallery, one artist.
Little in common.

I think this is a good freestyle copy.

In any case, your photos can not understand anything in particular.

That's true, a figure is, there are other differences, the trees are not "converted", as in your picture:

Вложение 822771

Your the same as dark as you have the photo?

understand it, these works should be compared?

Hard to believe that the left, you refer belongs Volkov - very helpless.

And right - well, how sweet!

Igor Guriev, well, you and fastidious :D

And how do you this job?

My daughter recently attracted to photography.
I looked at the screen over his shoulder, on the job, and he says - well-focused picture though.
I say, option, let's discuss ...
Conclusion - "sharpness" is pointed at the first row of birch. Furthermore, from this plane, "sharpness" gently falls to the foreground and background.
But do not jump, gently ...
And the rear and fore presented with no particular loss of brightness of color, a simple conclusion - or a good photographer, a good lens .:D:D

If you consider giving to review the work at an angle above discussion, - the level many times lower.

Honestly, I did not write
Volkov has written some 500 works. Most variations of several of his works. Eat like.
Zalezte in the network and see for yourself.

Added after 8 minutes
My darker and much more.
Trees believed Volkov in its original form. Then distorted the term, cleaned (streamlined) fore, stuck to pity the old woman let a little house on the left (the viewer) the slope - and all at once let snot.
It was an autumn melancholy, became nostalgic for years.
Artist!
Present.
Able not only to change his plan in the variation, but also to reveal its spectacular facilities.

A version similar to my opinion, reached - just got into the network.

Added after 17 minutes
I agree with the lack of sharpness.
Pulled vein, staying home to be immobilized.
I begin to walk, stand it on the street and photograph well.
I am interested in the second picture. Volkov forever rewriting the same thing.
I've never seen anyone her?

how do you find such a variation ?:)

And he left, too? Or is your work in Photoshop?

No, not him.
That's me to the fact that he could not be ascribed to work only on what is depicted.

Dear Sergey!
My starting point is not only and not so much liked by Volkov neighborhood of villas on Siverskaya as his masterly command of all imaginable and unimaginable tools of painting.
Ambush at the same place for any artist sketch pad, but what happened?
Volkov was able to step beyond the usual basic parameters (composition, perspective, modeling the form, light, color, stroke) and managed to achieve the main thing - he needed the audience reaction.
What infuriated many colleagues in the shop.
They do not know how and could not (were not able to - the German verb «können»).
Name me any of his contemporaries, who could achieve a striking effect of changing the perception of each of its repetitions plot.
Volkov was amazing, in my view, fantasy artist, who could not limit its repeat addition (decrease) trees, although he does it. Volkov was not able to («können») to copy their work. With his temperament is - is unattainable. He always something, but straight.
If you make a small hole in the tube with a good bottle of champagne - it spilled decaying jet. With foam and fast enough.
Volkov is a purely Russian irrepressible nature, such a good Braga, which will froth and pour endlessly, and, without any holes - over the edge.
     See what maketh Volkov and he liked borough.
Posted landscape. Not.
Posted cub. Not.
Change the year. Again, not that.
Stuck in the birch crown of firs. The tops of spruce trees in the sunset Counteropenwork closed the space, forming a kind of Colosseum. The walls of the Colosseum have turned the stream into an arena for the beam. Arena, decorated with birch. The dark fir walls simply push these white birches on the audience, dragging him into the arena. Pour the tea into the saucer, so go to the scene to examine it slowly, deliberately, at the same time and drink tea.
 Yes you have a saucer that Volkovskiy sunset ray zaplyashet himself.
And to cover your eyelids. You feel it yourself. Physically.
This is ownership. What can only the greatest masters.
At such moments, I do not care about comparisons estimentov. Well, where Shishkin with strangers bears in the woods before his magic Volkovsky ray?
That's it.
I'm not a bear, to empathize with bear games. Although all so well written.
 
Yesterday I wrote about snot, penetrate and current in each of the Volkov old woman in "October". All of these fir-sosenochki with river and fallen leaves - only the background for the old lady and nothing more. There is a picture of an old woman - and do not believe in a single authorship of the two paintings. And nobody, except the envious, has nothing to do with mastery of landscape images. Because in this case, the landscape - part of the aura of a poor old woman, who can not (shall not) be a bad thing. Volkov, not only made leak snot every spectator. He grabbed my throat and stung us in our eyes. After all, everyone imagined story of this poor old woman, beggar, who pehom rushing into a big city to feed and Living out.
How sick dog, which is looking for a place to die.
Each was born or born in the head has its own history of this old lady.
And the other old ladies.
Familiar and unfamiliar.
Who have nothing to eat and nowhere to sleep.
How does this rubles (dollars, euros, yuan) can vymeryat this Inclusivity?
Although each painting as a thing has its own (agreed by the parties) price.

P.S. Still, someone somewhere saw the plot of the second picture? With ray. I can not believe that Volkov has ceased to develop this plot.
In any case, cite the WCT visual ryadya mentioned my paintings EE Volkov, including those in the ranks of the paintings dubious (unsigned and owned by me).

did not catch on, but it does not matter :)
Here's an interesting video on the topic:

Thanks for the comment, of course - können, imstande sein.
Just as long as I was searching for Umlaut in the keyboard, I forgot - why and stuck another modal verb (mögen).
And what of my reflections on authorship Volkova?

P.S. Thanks for the link - look at night.

with the German need to tie - the language of heavy :)

By your works of anything clever to say I can not.
Even without decent photos is clear that the state works catastrophic.
Of course restoration is possible, but below the line, there will be almost nothing from the original one hundred years old.
Do not see the point of reference for a real comparison on it or is not he. Subjects works here does not count.
It can help a good photo?