Lost in the anchor
 

Sarnitsa, porcelain, underglaze and overglaze painting, stamp (with melted gold) on tylnike the tray.
Tray: 14,5 h19
Cover: 11,8 h15h10, 8 (height).
100%safety, except for worn-glaze painting on the tray. The left wall of the lid has a small deflection of the inside.

Actually, a is the anchor was raised in Chelsea, between the Golden Anchor-XVIII in ..
But, they say, later had a Chelsea did. And someone can not remember.

Agree with you - a brand, like, Chelsea (№ 5).
Tvorenka confused.

The paint rubs off? tried?

curious, the Germans had too many anchors. It would not have younger brothers.

True, but there is a form of anchors themselves a little different.

Cyril Syzranskiy,
Tightly.

Added after 4 minutes
NEO,
Cover dough with another. Porcelain thin, clear and transparent. Of course, inferior to modern Chinese.
Cyril Syzranskiy rights - the Germans another form of anchors.

Generally a pleasant thing ...

Well, it's mass production, no?
Almost mid 20 th century in feeling ...

All the porcelain mass production.

Well, of course, but when the circulation of many thousands of stenciling is one thing, but when the hand-painted - is another.

There generally seems to be a stencil.

Although hand-painted, too, nothing as such, does not say.

Cyril Syzranskiy, "But, in my opinion, not very old."
What and confusing.

curious, mark 18 th century, but not old thing? How's that?
Maybe Derby?
And why the bottom looks old, the impression that artificially old metal sponge. Stigma is not stripped?
IMHO, do not be too harsh

Comrades, stylistically it is someone like the 18 th century?

I - no end.

Rather shapeless structure, made in the mid 20 th century, when the form is just lost in all, including even such a master of the form from another form of art, as Deineka, for example, or Picasso.

Igor Guriev, totally agree!