Help, please identify the author, the time of writing, the approximate cost?
 

Help, please identify the author, the time of writing, the approximate cost? The painting got from the great-grandfather. It was brought from France. There are no numbers on it there.

Thanks in advance. I would be grateful for any information

Вложение 769921Вложение 769931Вложение 769951Вложение 769961Вложение 769971
Вложение 769981Вложение 769991Вложение 770001Вложение 770011

According to the plot like a penitent Mary Magdalene.

Execution time?
Perhaps the end of 18 century?
Italian school?

That is, from noodle say.

Or the second half of the 19 century?

Oh, no, rather the first.

Artist sufficient workmen left to find out whether it is a copy of the picture.

I think that this is not a picture, and printed materials.

I thought the same thing, incidentally.

Exactly: Pompeo Girolamo Batoni (or Button) (Pompeo Batoni , February 5, 1708 Lucca - February 4, 1787 Rome) "The Penitent Mary Magdalena " 1742, was in the Dresden Gallery, it is considered that perished in the bombardment of the city on Feb. 13, 1945. Or maybe not died?

Thank you for the information provided. This is exactly Pompeo Girolamo Batoni? how to determine orininal it? How much could it cost the original and the copy?

Carefully remove cloves, remove the flat (plywood) and make sure that it is printed, rather it is placed on the plywood. The frame is 500 rubles. Picture - practically nothing.

The original will cost a lot, maybe not a million. but hundreds of thousands.

Only it's not original.

Anyway, you did not answer the question: is REPRODUCTION or oil on canvas?

If the oil on canvas, make a more decent photos, a few snippets that you can understand how long a copy.

There seems to have many differences. For example, in your picture is a skull, and the original is just a stone.
Yes, and vegetation too, seems different.

In short, it is probably a copy of the first half of the 19 century.

And in general the impression that this color lithography - to your photo.

Artwork done on plywood, but no film is not there. What is marked with a symbol, I do not know.

The skull in the picture are (under books).

Yes, this is understandable.
in the original it is not for some reason.

What is strange.

Skull should be vapscheta.

Igor, you are noticeably less fluent in Russian, unlike many on this forum.
Please, do not mutilate what is left of the "great and mighty." Thank you

There have been so to speak.

But next time I will tell otherwise, of course.

In another style.

Added after 7 minutes
And you know what I love about this forum?

And, because there are genuine people, very different in that. It is, and sometimes "Senek" all of them are not under some characteristic message.

And these people: Granddaddy, LSR, Amateur, Cyril Syzran, Serdzhenuovo If you like, and Guriev, Igor, and even more now and I do not remember all.

Many mileyshih and in their own way looking at the art of people.

For example, I and comrade. LSR little intersection in preferences, but I'm always curious to read what she wrote.

And where the actual photo of the original, if that was lost when bombandirovke Dresden Gallery in 1945? C than in general compare?

Well, color reproduction of paintings has long been known, even before the Anglo-American bombing of Dresden.

And could you put the original photo, if anyone have this opportunity, just very interesting. What could be my picture? And who could write it then?