Abstract
 

That became a familiar and asked to evaluate - not in terms of price, but in terms of artistic merit. Ie is - full kitsch, or something in that is? I myself, unfortunately, are not familiar with this painting. Coloring of a diverse, balanced, with a distance of 5 meters looks nothing. In my opinion, like someone's abstract and surreal portrait. Oil on cardboard, 29h21 see no signature. As painting and cardboard age - about 30 - 40 years.

It's more like a sketch.

Well, okay.

And in color - so even nothing.

You accidentally flavor with a tone not to be confused? The coloring in this picture nothing special, even if he is in it and existents.

No, not confused.
Underlying feelings of color - just a sense of tonality.

And for me, "color", "tone", "saturation"-are indivisible.

You can even add a "temperature" of color.

Added after 1 minutes
And can some epithet to give color of this picture (except for "I even anything" )?

Color is built quite competently, there is a range, which was built on a cold background and tepid twirl in front.

Drawn really badly, hastily and unoriginal.

No idea of plastic in the picture is not contained.

I have seen "three full essence of flying to the light" (no kidding :-)). Pleasant thing.
PS: "Light" with a capital letter

Thank you. And for me - no there is no color at all, and there was not, as the artist did not start with this and have not yet reached this stage (if it is in my head at all it was). The work is divided into 2 of the plan - near and far. Local color of the foreground in no way correlated with the tonal colors of the background.

Abstraction just good freedom of interpretation and the fact that something brings to the associative urovne.O this work, but rather a sketch or unfinished work in the initial stadii.Est base composition, the approximate colouristic ideya.Nikakoy further development of painting there.

If you rotate the image 90 degrees counterclockwise - it will look, in my opinion, more interesting :D

I think, unifying all is - in the form of a pyramid, starting from the bottom. That itself, which is separated from the square in the section "beam", also reaching to the visual foreground. By the way, it seems to me that somewhere I have something similar already seen.

Perhaps you're right. In the orange-red curls going from the middle of the top to the bottom right corner I see the outlines of faces in profile (eyebrow, sharp nose, lips, chin, neck), so I just committed the image. Also the rule "light top - a dark bottom." But it usually works in the rotated image. Here are just a "profile person" disappears. But it becomes clear that moving away from a light square, three such "beam", one above the other, the lower the "Expand".

Despite the sketch, I think that this is not haltura.Est dynamics and clearly laid down a definite idea. There is logic in the organization of space.

Dissect abstraction-it neblagodarnoe.Moe feeling that the artist was trying to relax, but before the end failed.