"Lyalya naked Viktor Reikhet. Who knows where she is?
 

Dear artists, connoisseurs, collectors! Show you where in a collection or a museum is the painting of Victor Reikhet?

Attachment 643691

To my Live Journal to publish this outstanding work quite by accident came a model, that same Lyalya that depicted here. She told me about himself and that in passing once saw this picture in annonse show on the channel "Culture".

So painting is alive and the case for small - to find her.

This picture was published in ARTINDEX, it seems a number 6.Naberite gugle.V in this edition is information about the artists.

 From there I took the picture in this post, but information about it (ie the picture) not found. You do not see it yet, then do not tell me if there is information about the picture (not the author)? I may be the site not sorted out ?:shy: I'm on them are not very often go

In this edition only information about the authors. But Peter Reikhet associated with Tretyakov Gallery, St. Petersburg. Contact tel. gal. +7 (812) 233 10 07, still listed phone. may be the artist himself - +7 (812) 234 40 20 or +7 (921) 976 95 70

Who wants to buy (Lyalya or Mona?)

No, Mona can not afford such purchases, especially if the picture is from the collection and light on "Culture" is the price of its already skyrocketed. It also and worth it. Interest in Lyalya. Can I buy? - I know. In my LJ will be continued on the other day with photos of real Lyalya - it is still better than a beauty and very similar, the artist captured the essence - we must admit

K-Maler! Thank you for your attention! necessarily call ... now that's the proklyunulos :)

And here is interesting, but how much does it cost?

That's right, Syzransky Cyril, have long observed that the selling we rotate one shit, but real art to the side and nothing. Money to make and sell the benefits may be best just kitsch or something that can not be called kitsch. IT at any level! - Here for example fashion Kiseleva 19 th century - quite feeble pops by who it unwound? and forgeries? market moves in 5 times more work than he did, and even more. We ВОБЩЕ NO artrynka, there is a wild forest.
 This phenomenon is particularly pronounced for Russia. Many eye for detail. Gelman and therefore went to the actual art, which is a traditional but quality does not weld neither money nor interest, the public simply did not see, does not distinguish.

This is a senior Reikhet thing, ie Victor IOSIFOVICH.

Well, its a thing on the market there.
Or do it like once and had a view when they said
You mean his things?

Added after 6 minutes
And it eali conversation went:
And the fashion Kiseleva even exist? Yes, and "poppy" is usually called popular. And how popular, if, as you say
And its something on the market and no. Some talk makes it possible for the case Preobrazhensky, which has more than 5 years.

No need to juggle at once. No, I'm not talking about his stuff. They can be represented in the market, but you said yourself that they probably will not choose

I had not vvizhu Reikhet a trend. The buyer is more to blame in it than the seller. Buyer without taste, not brought up artistically. While he is - advantageous offer to the seller that the buyer anything. And it can understand.


Enough "Kiselyov. If it is not, because the grind this crap like hotcakes. Every now and then emerge a lucky contenders here and there with the question "Is it true Kiselev?", "How to determine membership and receive a certificate Tretyakov," has a business on the certificates on it. I DO NOT TRADE versed in the art proficiency! it has no relation to art. I ask my questions on trade does not pester

Trade and art are related approximately as the theory of electricity and trade lights. Different things not related to each other. Because not want to go to this site.

I do not "distort", and simply specify.


Added after 5 minutes
And if we talk about taste, then here is a picture
for me is not the "icon" of high taste.

Posted 17 minutes later
Opened and looked.
There's nothing I saw about the fact that "the buyer 90%of cases choose Worst of the proposed"
Saw only:
and the portrait of Count Tolstoy's avatar.

Specify in which time: I do not have any relationship to trade. At home I stuck that on the wall for decades.

There, and will not have this phrase on the first page, strange how you :shy: Open Magazine (click on the name), traverse the links, read, you may be something useful. As I understand you are doing about the same, but in the outback. Look at the "cultural capital". If that is not understood - I beg your pardon, it is difficult to me razbiratsya the habit and did not realize it worth it to me?

Are you about St. Petersburg?

Added after 2 minutes
No, I must confess, I'm in their "backwoods" enlightenment okolohudozhestvennoy or public money has not engaged and did not even dream to eliminate her "stupidity and arrogance."

No, you are very difficult to talk. You are different parts of the Promise stick together in contradictory arguments. This logic is deceptive tactics. These words (I will explain to the readers here), you nadergali of my words and presented them as the position of selling art (artdilerov - so they are called ?)... once doubt creeps in with a decent man ... you really must excuse me :shy:

No, I'm not an artist and seems to hit the wrong way, because there are only two parties - the artists and traders

Yes? And I thought that I'm easy to talk. It is easy and pleasant ...
No?
It's all "remote places ...
You something in the "cultural capital" is good, but here ...