Photo from the exhibition "Russian poor" from LiveJournal
 

Photo Another user with the exhibition "Russian poor" in Perm http://drugoi.livejournal.com/2722490.html#comments I liked the "Heck" Kosolapova and concrete skate Alexander Brodsky (Gorky Park|1997). A lot of creativity and general level is much higher than that of other distinguished guests.

Thank you! I still liked the work tape (on the stage, did not understand whose). "Music Box" Shabelnikova (with a thoughtful opera singing) also caused a smile-nice about the truth of life. Yes, and a library of Pinocchio.

Library "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Pinocchio
No words ....

Actually with duct tape virtuoso works Valery Koshlyakov. So certainly it.

Yes funny "exhibits", but I always want to ask: What is the fate of the artist (eg bathroom with operatic singing) his work? I can not imagine a person who purchases "singing toilet" to his home.

I think so and presents. What work for exhibitions and museums for contemporary art. Although the same "shark in formaldehyde, which is also difficult to imagine a home, are in private hands. There are generally works of disabilities. Here's what to do if Koshlyakov carried out work with tape on the wall? There would save - and the happiness, and only the transport and the question.

Well, here was a man (like Abramovich) for the exhibition and fuse, an opera toilet. I decided to buy on the occasion. I brought him to the cottage, and put it on his six hundred square m next to his. I think why I bought it? It was simpler to put the tape in the old.

Alexander Kosolapov. Mincer|1972. Also not bad ...

Ogrooomnom With all due respect to all of you, you still basically argue as gallery owners, artdilery, art historians, collectors ...
Yes does artist is not represented by the fate of his work (which often happens, with some exceptions), his idea was born, and he embodied it, and then both go, how lucky.
  In this case, , joking, and I think he succeeded, as surely many smiled, and I do not think it durnovkusie, quite correctly, and the concept of the exhibition. Nobody said that it is a masterpiece, but it raises a smile, but no rejection, rejection (as a handful of jars). Sorry, I have this perception.

I think it sounds too pathetic. So, probably, should be, but rarely. Artists IMHO still think someone is selling (in a meeting) and that more in demand. Otherwise, would not have started this phenomenal format in the "unofficial art" as "a painting, a suitcase size. That is just such an alien it could comfortably put it in a suitcase. So do not idealirovat: IMHO all think about his daily bread. And this is normal.

Vladimir - agree 100%.
Of course those who think and how it will get. But these thoughts are not important and they do all the same because they wanted to mess things up.
Yet imagine the video sequence. Sleeps Pushkin and suddenly jumps and throws to record a couple of lines - it is beautiful. Sleeps Picasso - jumps and throws to the easel - too beautiful. But sleeping Yuri Shabelnikov - jumps and runs to beat the board on singing opera, toilet - nice?

again, smile again, ridiculous, idea Shabelnikova again worked: p
I think still more than you think

In Chukotka quite different toilets: they represent two hefty cudgel.

I heard he was there Canadian cottages set so that the jokes are disappearing? This "Chukotka" - is 150 kilometers from Moscow, the village lies, nobody cares there.

Vladimir,
thanks for the photo essay. Was surprised to find that I was something like it.