What to do with counterfeiting
 

How is that? Dear foruchanin, recognizing in this forum that owns a fake, sells it in another place and passed off as the original words with reservations "on the authorship of the signature. A sketch or preliminary version of the larger and later work." At least it is not correct, as well as the maximum offense. I honestly do not remove things from circulation or mark the "copy".

And this is what you mean now?

V teme "Kataloznye opisaniia", ia by skazal, chto eto vzaimoiskliuchaiuschie utverzdeniia.

authorship of the signature - neuverennost 'v avtorstve.

a sketch or preliminary version of the larger and later work - ch'ei?

Cyril Syzransky, see here
http://molotok.ru/item872893297_kart...enie_ceny.html

 Price 152rublya.50 cop? 5 dol13tsentov? Did not sell as well gives ....

The minimum is not specified and is not reached. The fact that commercial sale with the accompanying description with all the background is not perfect.

Besides forgery will walk farther. And the artist's name damage.

There all honestly napisano.Eto his thoughts and his pravo.V the right to write their thoughts and may not pokupat.A those questions which you put and answers, what you give, say that would be better if you go to work in opera <! - ~ 1 ~ - "You can not deprive people of opportunities to learn not from textbooks :)

Art-ort,
everything would be so if the seller has not informed on this forum earlier that owns a fake.
And at the opera, the copyright still no one has repealed. As for your "learn", you know, when you buy, we pay real money, not fake and do not offer sellers learn to fight fraud.
The questions that I put it in the first place the protection of author's name and the purity of the market.

Spend money on books on art and walking around the museums and then you would be a pity to waste time on such a fight ... Copyright here nobody narushil.Nikto Stozharov not deprived of the right to the original of this work, a product made by another artist is the product of another artist (Unfortunately because of Rossiyskim laws).

Art-ort, about the interpretation of copyright law and acts seller mistaken. Not going to teach you, merely stating.

Well, it says all the most honest:

SergeiSK information is not concealed, on the contrary warns the potential buyer.

Vladimir, the seller slukavil, because this forum said "I confess, this is my fake Stozharau" and showed it. Ie work is a counterfeit, that recognized including community. A sale of such things in such a way that is with the signature and approval, saying with the subjective opinion of the author's son, despite the fact that you yourself say "fake" it, and at least not correctly.
It is strange that all protect the seller, and no one expressed that the purpose of the forum, this is including the formation of relationships in the field of trafficking in art objects, and the protection of heritage and name of artists.

We must do something to share, copy, and forgery. Counterfeits are found in an attic in a pile of old rubbish. Counterfeits must be destroyed because it is the theft of a famous artist.
Copies are copies. Stozharau not such an artist, who copied or imitated, it is not so expensive and rather academic. It may be that this is a gift someone else, or a childish prank.

Manufacturing, and may have been childish prank, until a signature is not struck, but the sale with full knowledge that the thing is not real good, then this thing go on like a bargain, but it is the author has nothing to do and defame his name.

Costa, to continue the fight and quietly move on to the book "Mein Campha"