Voting For and Against Thanked
 

I propose to vote for the ratings system, blagodarneystey kind of "thank you".

I think that this particular function will not be meaningless, existed and is creating unnecessary desire to show off some very active participants, is the discussion of the form "I am right - and you're a fool," fills in redundant posts forum members with a desire to make something "smart" to you later say "thank you".

If you think that the post of some members of the forum was useful to you and you want him to repay, it is always possible to do write a message or express gratitude to the following on the same topic.

I am sure that without this system "thank you" forum has nothing to lose, and only purchased.

ABC, it seems to me that this is not from the "thank you" depends ... on the forum many diverse people. Someone likes to talk too, to engage in polemics, etc. Others go into the light and its concise, substantive phrases hit right in the bull's-eye. All this only adds one another. Main respect his companion!

So the button "Thank you", just designed to simplify this procedure. Imagine a theme, where there will be mass communications to just say thank you.

I gave his opinion here: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=47593
: D

I do not want to offend anybody, but many participants age of puberty, increased hormonal activity and long gone from the list of reasons motivating the desire to stand for office and brag they have not exactly the first place.
Спасиб system saves time and words - shows the public interest in the topic, the participant does not need to write a message, yes, what an interesting subject, let's talk, he simply adds a thank you. And if the topic without Thank-so it seems unnecessary. Is convenient.

In fact thanks buns and medals do not give that or I missed something important?

ABC, it is not likely somehow connected, by removing the function of thanks, wishing to make something clever not diminish, but about the odd positions so that some participants only and do, and not who they are not thanked for it. That is to say gratuitously fill Forum redundant posts;)

No, unfortunately, do not give ... : D

Seriy,
SAH,

Just here I disagree with you. I think at the forum there are people who write messages to kitchevaniya their "knowledge" or "intelligence" before the others, and the "thank you" is only a supporting factor for such posts.

In general, should also be noted that in most forums does not matter what subject, the administration of such a function is not included.

Seems can any ...
Do not rush to conclusions, you are not a lot here, wait a little longer be present, perhaps, that feel bydet is another.

Yes I just had time to notice much. I just like OlegTsi for example, do not seek to answer in each subject and on every convenient occasion. and other things to do.

Well you did not so long on the forum. And then what happens to you some kitsch with their "knowledge" or "mind" to others and those others support theirs kitchevanie a function thanks? It may not have to rush to conclusions, it is worth a closer look at the participants read the old threads and all that.

It's all numbers. who and how much Day at the forum, but to whom many thanks expressed. If someone these numerical indicators more does not mean that others mistakenly argue. From the side, as they say, know better.

Brag !!!!!

In! And do I have the shaft: I have a lathe or to the office in the mornings do not go, my job is related to communications, which is the my computer very often, I sit at home and read a forum, replied when there is an answer. : D
Do you have another psychotype, another temperament, so for God's sake! "-Can do nothing to answer! It would be that the answer-that's the main thing ...

That's right, write down the reason and without. If only the administration of then not surprised that the forum so much sracha. (hello Constantine;))

And argue with you, only time to spend. last word still will not be able to not leave behind him. for sim removed. support my initiative almost did not find.