Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Rate hare! (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=41856)

SergeiSK 14.09.2009 13:38

Rate hare!
 
Over the weekend, shot a rabbit!
P. Kovalevsky, cardboard, oil, 31h22, 5 cm, 1864. Examination of the Russian Museum.
How much nowadays such rabbits? :)

наследник 14.09.2009 14:22

SergeiSK, a conclusion which is dated? This is without pitfalls ask:)

Pavel 14.09.2009 14:42

Barbarians! poor hare, soup or stew?

14.09.2009 15:56

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK (Сообщение 603136)
How much nowadays such hares?

The question really is not an idle question.
On the one hand and Conclusion name, with another student's work "as a creative artist's manner has not yet arisen" Here, perhaps more illustrative biographical value than artistic.

Кирилл Сызранский 14.09.2009 16:03

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir (Сообщение 603206)
but how is dated conclusion?

The document has no date of issue is invalid. Yes, and ref. Number on the document should be.

14.09.2009 17:49

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 603376)
document without the date of issuance is invalid. Yes, and ref. Number on the document should be.

Well, the date, say postavit.A forgotten about the original, so - as his record? Paper issued by the institution and not a group of individuals referred to themselves as experts, a fact of which the museum confirmed "the engineer "(????) personnel department and the seal of the personnel department.
Probably so tried to circumvent bans ... Received several comic-what is the average between the "expert" opinion and "help" the fact of work.

наследник 14.09.2009 19:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV (Сообщение 603606)
Paper issued by the institution and not a group of individuals, called themselves as experts, a fact of which the museum confirmed "the engineer "(????) personnel department and the seal of the personnel department .

Roman-Korsakov's a whole museum's worth, and what is printing OK, this is common, prescribed regulations. Just this and says the official examination.
I am interested in the date
SergeiSK, the conclusion of the year? Not see? You have only one sheet?

SergeiSK 14.09.2009 19:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV (Сообщение 603606)
I guess so tried to circumvent the prohibitions ...

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir (Сообщение 603776)
Roman-Korsakov's a whole museum's worth, and what is printing OK, this is common, prescribed regulations. Just this and says the official examination.

Gentlemen
You have answered all the questions:) Findings RM letterhead with water marks are not issued for about two to three years. But you can quite officially ordered examination in SRM and get exactly that conclusion, what you see here. And you understand that the opinion of Rimsky-Korsakov more expensive than any form of printing. At this Kovalevsky examination was obtained in 2007. I can assure that it is real, as the authorship of Kovalevsky.

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 603376)
document without the date of issuance is invalid. Yes, and ref. Number on the document should be.

You're on familiar terms with all the experts of the country and the world! They're all you Svetka Mih.Mihi etc. Call the State Russian Museum, and they all tell. If they deem it necessary. A better self-examination will get there and then tell about it peace ...

14.09.2009 19:48

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir (Сообщение 603776)
Roman-Korsakov's a whole museum's worth, and what is printing OK, this is common, prescribed regulations. Just this and says the official examination.

What rules? Where and when it became commonplace? So, if there is no press OK - expertise is not valid? Inventions.
I have seen and ekspertizy.Vse letterhead institutions, with all rekvizitov.Podpisi - experts, art historians, the signature of the head of the organization, the date stamp. And the same registration number with the signature of the person responsible for registratsiyu.Ni what engineers and assistant warden is not a trace .

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK (Сообщение 603826)
I can assure that it is real, as the authorship of Kovalevsky.

There is somneniy.Oboshli silly bans - understandable!. Only now have a date set.

SergeiSK 14.09.2009 19:56

Цитата:

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV (Сообщение 603836)
But that's the date should be set.

Agree. I saw several similar findings in Ginet, Beggrova and someone else, can not remember. All without a date! I see no reason not to put a date, but it does not write! I have a few private examinations, expert consultations, the Tretyakov Gallery. Same without dates.

наследник 14.09.2009 20:55

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK (Сообщение 603826)
At this Kovalevsky examination was obtained in 2007.

Thank you. I felt this is important.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
Цитата:

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV (Сообщение 603836)
What Rules? Where and when it became commonplace? So, if there is no press OK - expertise is not valid? Inventions.
I have seen and ekspertizy.Vse letterhead institutions, with all rekvizitov.Podpisi - experts, art historians, the signature of the head of the organization, the date stamp. And the same registration number with the signature of the person responsible for registratsiyu.Ni what engineers and assistant warden is not a trace .

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

There is somneniy.Oboshli silly bans - understandable!. Only now have to put the date.

If you are on something insist ... such as forms, regulations, prohibitions, etc., then do not stand for a long time - comes stagnation.
To Rome to circumvent the ban in this way .... with a suitcase of money throw. There is a suitcase? Try.: O

muhin 14.09.2009 22:38

Private examination to obtain it should be familiar to anyone from ekspertov.Stoit 2 times cheaper muzeynoy.Ne issued on official letterhead, conducted by specialists muzeya.Pri desire to go to the administration and order official, will meet this one in one, and the cost 2 times more expensive.
PSSergejSK, on a little-seen Ginet scratched with a signature and cows in the foreground?

14.09.2009 23:45

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir (Сообщение 603976)
If you are on something insist ... such as forms, regulations, prohibitions, etc., then do not stand for a long time - comes stagnation.
To Rome to circumvent the ban in this way .... with a suitcase of money throw. There is a suitcase? Try.

Well, what you write ..... Vinigret words what you ....

наследник 15.09.2009 00:54

Цитата:

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV (Сообщение 604206)
Well, what you write ..... Vinigret words what it ....

Well, if it is not clear, then scold his wife for vinigret.
How's GDP western journalists answered? Learn supposedly his wife to cook cabbage ... And you blamed for the wrong salad.:)

... Generally speaking, this is an allusion about the long distance on your - "If you say something, then just go away, do not stand in all this." (C) But I do not like so - in the forehead, I thought you will understand. ИзвЕните.
.. Yes ... about the suitcase ... not yet collected for Rimsky-Korsakov and employee OK?

uriart 15.09.2009 07:17

The authenticity of such examinations is quite normal.
These were issued after the ban museums to review.
I have with this and not the one!


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 18:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot