Painting - a copy or not?
 

Dear experts, help please, this picture is a copy or not. Its size 90 * 165 co year of establishment of about 1965
Thank you.
Sincerely, Fam.

Thisbetter question, which I saw on this forum!

This is a copy.

Pay attention to facial expressions of women.

Yes, and the man left a woman to do something with the eyes: confused:

She does not like pigeons. : D

At that time she
  served swans. :) (about 1965)

 
And you know why? Compositionally correctly, but painting - alas! Hence the conclusion - a copy.
  And suddenly, not a copy? And the original front of us. Then - a rarity!

Copying like? Not "Mona Lisa" is ... I think that this is not a copy, and the author must search among the Central Asian and Caucasian artists, already very person-specific:)

A copy of a copy ...
And stodvadtsataya, apparently. I only Reale saw three or four pieces, and only in the network ...
I even knew the author and original title ...
By the way, recently, about a month ago, testified at a forum such as a copy of one of Eastern Ukrainian city ...

... And where are the wrong laws of gravity - look, as the Star of the Hero hanging.
And more nonsense. Hero of about 35, but he is - a junior officer, one lumen of the pursuit. And time after the war.
In general, not a copy, and original! Moreover, draw, apparently, through the inspiration and memory.

Correctly noted:) It seems that the drawing or the photograph or have a copy of the picture.

Fam, on second thoughts I would have answered your question so wonderful, "original explanations.":)

The picture painted in most of White Russia (Belarus). At this time, all peoples are brothers.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 11 minutes[/color]
If by Barbara from Харкова then it probably is about this picture.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 14 minutes[/color]
Yes, too many orders for leytelanta.

No, from the turquoise from Lugansk.
And there is the letter itself was higher.

This is a new, little-studied area in the arts - "fotokopiizm.