Help with authorship
 

Dear forum users, help identify the author. I understand that it is not easy, so I will be grateful for any information, ideas, a version of the hypothesis), I almost forgot the size 71H33

Something tells me (probably a pencil made-up "A" and "th", but not in the line: D) - are trying to convince us that it is "possible" Aivazovsky.
  Who was brought to a stage now at all times, not cheap artist: cool:: confused:

For the signature, made butter, it is too clear-cut letters, and certainly the corners liter oil are unlikely to do. But if you believe it is written (after all, live it may look quite different), then it is really Aivazovsky. Other versions of the signature does not imply, in my opinion.
A picture really sorry. The restoration of her right place.

Signed utterly different (or rather what was left of it), Ivan Konstantinovich, even if the write up. And there are other versions? Signature made in Latin or Cyrillic?

I envy the forum participants, who can see in the monitor not only the signature Aivazovsky, but that it is "Improved the" pencil.
: D: D: D

In my opinion, it is even read the signature, but some moments I am perplexed ...

A Improved the whether she, and the Improved the ... this I can not judge. And in this sense your envy, Kirill, ignoring as groundless: D: D: D

you surely prompted: D

I do not see here, what they read something you can?

Dear forum users, let us digress from the art of Ivan Konstantinovich (despite the fact that the work is done with a clear "zakosom)
Are there any other ideas about the signature and the work itself?
Maybe it's latin but not Cyrillic?
I would appreciate any idea.

In my opinion this is Cyrillic, the second letter J and the letter is drawn in Russian:)

For comparison.
 

Here's a sample signature Aivazovsky.
If we assume that the signature on the submitted canvas Aivazovsky, we can see that writing letters in different and the first in not the same as the original.

With increasing clear that this is not the canvas and matting. Its almost impossible to sensibly primed and write it to a pasty. Narrow, "close" the space is not typical for compositions Aivazovsky ...

Dear forum users, thank you for taking an active part in addressing this issue, I hope you do not stop there.

I just can not understand why you would need to discuss this picture?
So it is clear that this "tabloid painting!
And signatures Aivazovsky is clearly not in the subject.

Perhaps this is a prototype raboty.Konechno, the level of my not tot.Prosto I thought that thing was fairly well known to her tried to copy, exhibited.