In whom more profitable to invest?
 

I like money in exchange for a series offered the following sponsors:
Konstantin Batynkov,
Victor Sedov
Zhdanov,
A. Bantikov,
O. Lang
ES Vakhtangov.
It is all modern artists, and immediately tell me that none of them do not like. But now is no choice and I have exchanged with a view to further sale. Advise - any of these artists is a potential for growth?

I like the finished work Bantikova but he has a lot of unfinished works and sketches - they nravyatsya.Ya I do not think its quite possible to complete work on them changes its demand is there.: Shy:

SergeiSK, all the artists horoshie.No without works, as you can give some advice? There are sketches, drawings, just continuous work ...

Let's think logically: the strongest in the exhibition included the turnover Batynkov (respectively, newspapers, catalogs, etc.) In addition, it proizvdeniya not difficult to see in museums, in good collections at key trade fairs and exhibitions of contemporary art. More importantly, it is the presence of a string of leading auctions of Russian art. So much for the "magic name" (nobody has to explain who this Batynkov) and liquidity. That is a factor of quality of work we ignore, because there is no work for specific information.

Sedov this? http://artinvestment.ru/news/exhibit...tor_sedov.html I liked his work in the A3. According to market parameters (liquidity included in market turnover) advantages over Batynkov just not. This is the express opinion.

He climbed into our database for Batynkov: 15 auction results (one work - graphics, and the rest - painting). The best result is 12.5 tys.funtov last year at Sotheby's. Two-meter canvas absurd "boat". General style of the artist is very varied, so you need to watch a specific picture.

Sergei vote for Constantine Batynkov ..

I will definitely placed here offer the pictures on the exchange. So to say "bear on the general discussion":) has already written the man and asked him photos and a description of exactly Batynkov. It's that small planes and vertoletiki of his paintings depicts? Or is Bantikov? I do not confuse the above names.

Vladimir,
Eugene,
There is. Sell your photos offered on the exchange of works by Konstantin Batynkov. Zenn has not yet been sent, I'll write in a day or two. In the meantime, interested in opinion and the approximate score:
1. Watercolor, 30 x 25 cm - 4 work
2. On canvas, ink, 202 x 106 cm
3. On canvas, ink, 167 x 106 cm
4. Canvas, ink. 201 x 106 cm
5. Watercolor, 40 x 30 cm
6. Watercolor, 40 x 30 cm
7. Watercolor, 40 x 30 cm
8. Watercolor, 40 x 50 cm
9. Watercolor, 40 x 50 cm
10. Watercolor, 40 x 50 cm

What do you say? Present and planes and vertoletiki:)

SergeiSK, I liked 5 and 6 of the interesting component of the absurd.

I can not say that my hero, but from the submitted probably would have chosen this way:
Photo 1: pluses - there is a text and can be conceptual "hanging", komplesnoe clearance. If you collect 4 drawings together, we get an interesting set of at least 50 to 60. Cons - small size (individually).
Photo 4: pluses - Technology (hosts) recognizable images. The plot is gloomy, but the smoke over neftevyshkoy - it's better than a plane over the ocean. Cons: gigantic size, for two meters of such beauty is not just going to find a place in the room.
Photo 5: pluses: a comfortable size for graphics and a very recognizable images. Cons: painting better than the graphics. What is better? What is the schedule:)
Photo 7: calming the plot, decorative, calmly. Bungalow kind. But good for Batynkov absence of a characteristic of the disaster? Is the question.

In general, most of all have fluctuated between photo 1 and photo 7:)

And you can climb up with your opinion? I Sedov more like: interesting color and style distinct ... besides, there is in his works is something touching ...

SergeiSK, ja, lichno, uje zakupil neskolko cholstov O. Langa, hotja sam ne lublu, no perspektiva bessomnennaja (sorry for the letters, I am out of Russia )....

To finally assemble (or disassemble?: P) a picture of opinions, I might add that I liked the ladies - a strain, but not global, in practice, a triptych - would have stopped them, or on photo 1:)

there is no recognition in young ladies, visitors will have to explain that this is the Batynkov that with absurdist disasters and technological phantasmagoria:) It's as if suddenly drew a Shishkin storm at sea.

I would take military figures 3pc. And girls.

recognition on the hand is, and the disaster there:), but the chamber
bungalow too much, but it really calming uncharacteristic ...
and just, apparently, the girls closer to me than the explosions and planes:)