Wassily Kandinsky, the original?
 

Good day! We would like to know your opinion on the film and how it was genuine. The picture was investigated using optical microscopy, digital microscopy, UV light with beams of wood, methods of IR reflectography, x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and infrared spectroscopy with Fourier transform (FTIR). Thank you :)

Accordingly, after this the art examination.
Personally I don't think this Century, Kandinsky.

[QUOTE="John Preston;3386411"]Accordingly is then held art expertise@ In Paris?:)
So picture a pleasant, informative, why not Kandinsky?

Toliy, you are wrong orentirovki. If you are so hung previsite.
Must be positioned so that the trees and grass were growing up, and the sun shone down

Possibly, although it could in NINE or Grabarek try show...
redbor, do You really think that there is even the slightest chance that it might be C. K.? :)

redbor, Thank you, not quite realized in the forum :)

[QUOTE="John Preston;3386411"]Accordingly is then held art expertise@
Actually,it is logical to first conduct art .And then ,if there are strong arguments "for" to make technology as the more expensive.
And to do these expertise independent from other institutions ,"in the blind".
Then we can talk about some truth.
And so it is enough to find accommodating expert critic "name" (which is not difficult - they are now all "named") and it will attract the ears of all that he wills.And then we will go to auction , buy from yourself for completeness of the legalization process and to search for the Loch buyer.

[QUOTE=тандем;3386461]Actually,it is logical to first spend iskustvovedchesko@

Logical-it is logical. Seller a question: since technology is already on hand, why not make art?

Apparently, the answer to this question will not be.

Question Toliy - story in this picture?

tips from personal experience or from Newspapers learned? :)

[QUOTE="John Preston;3386471"]Apparently, the answer to this question is not budet@
On the contrary, I think TC will receive the opinion of the critic, as you recommended him. Chemistry is - the case for small. In Paris photo to send for consultation

The Toliy a daddy with expertise already filed. It is only one sheet showed.:)
Cute, this picture.

I would also chest x-rays recommended...

[QUOTE="eustace;3386501"]Toliy a daddy with expertise already podset@

And daddy can immediately Fund Kandinsky!

Their dirty hints leave with you.
This scheme legalization suddenly pop-up "masterpieces" known to all collectors and old as the world. "A daddy with expertise" is for a penny of Balabanov. When determining the authenticity, there are no trifles.They always weightier "daddy".....And we need to start with the simplest - where this painting?!
Century Century, Kandinsky ,this is not some DOE ,whose paintings are scattered in attics,abandoned dashcam and grandma's walls ,where they hung as much as the current owner of "remember".

is there such a Fund? Prize. Kandinsky not his idea?:)

And really, who in Russia you for advice? D. C. Sarabyanov died in 2013-Valery M. Stefanovich Turchin died just 10 days ago.

Who else (well, except, of course, participants theme :)) maybe, if you don't set it with a degree of reliability to assume or reject the authorship?

redbor, Send information to the Fund Kandinsky in Paris.
You will be asked to bring a picture to work with her "live"
My opinion - in the furnace of her!

I don't know whether it's art )