Please help with the attribution of the two works.
 

Hello, dear friends.
Please help in identifying the author (or authors) of the two works.
"Haystacks". Cardboard, oil. Size h.
-"Outskirts". Cardboard, oil. Size 24.H.5.
Both works are written on primed art cardboard. On the reverse only jammed stamps 1953 (?) or 1958 (?).
Work under the glass, which is a little glare.
Ask your opinions.
Thank you.

[QUOTE=Пряник;3317111]Hello, dear friends.
Please help in identifying the author (or authors) of the two works.
"Haystacks". Cardboard, oil. Size h.
-"Outskirts". Cardboard, oil. Size 24.H.5.
Both works are written on primed art cardboard. On the reverse only jammed stamps 1953 (?) or 1958 (?).
Work under the glass, which is a little glare.
Ask your opinions.
Spasibo@

Good painting, decorated with textured brush strokes. This is the proper brush work.

[QUOTE="Пряник;3317111"]Please help in identifying the author (or authors) of the two robot@
You need to pass these works "show" a friend the art critic.
Suddenly he will have serious assumption that the sketches belongs Stepanov or Turgenskom.

Thanks for the advice and information contained in Your version. Unfortunately, the 50 years of the twentieth century, its time period.
Let me remind you:

Drew attention to the word "tired". Perhaps familiar art read other dates on the stamps.

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3317311]Drew attention to the word "tired". Perhaps familiar art read other dates on Stanach@
Do not be alarmed. Other signatures and stamps no.

It is possible that some of the disciples S. Malyutina?

Cake, You are unlikely to be able to establish the authorship of these studies, if they have no provenance and if the turnover does not contain any entries, giving a sample of the handwriting of the author. Except that I'll try to read print, turning to forensic investigators. But where does that get You - the big question.

S. Malyutin taught at the VKhUTEMAS until 1923.
Suppose there he studied (and understood) the author (s) of these sketches, written over 30 or 35 years. That's your logic?

Good time.
And the sketches are good, especially liked the first one. Register and let pleasing to the eye.
It seems that the author alone.
With HC.

[QUOTE=Homoludens;3325321]Cake, You are unlikely to be able to establish the authorship of these studies, if they have no provenance and if the turnover does not contain any entries, giving a sample of the handwriting of the author. Except that I'll try to read print, turning to forensic investigators. But where does that get You - big vopros@
Hello.
Special provenance no. Bought a "stack" together with other works, among which was including S. Malyutin (already identified).
The origin of the debris collection A. S. Zhigalko. So I mess around with these sketches.
Thank You for the suggestion.

Just above spoke about the reasons of its logic.
Just started to look over the work of the authors.
Seemed like Malyutina (for example on the landscape in the Appendix). However, Soviet stamps on art Board with dates-53-58 years exclude the authorship of Sergei Bagapsh, who died in 1937.
Author (s) studies in the mid 50's could be already in 50-70 years.
Thank you.

[QUOTE=Artoil-A;3317151]This is the proper brush rabota@
The wrist is calligraphy. There are special brushes that Machaut in ink, and can without lifting the brush from the paper, silk, and so forth, to draw a line on the thickness of the hair up to a few centimeters.
Why in oil painting people all the time to swing - "brush work"? Well, not idiots here, anyone can see what is written and how! Stop erdicate!

Nothing in this landscape especially multiscopo no ordinary landscape in the spirit of that time.

[QUOTE=Пряник;3317111]Hello, dear friends.
Please help in identifying the author (or authors) of the two works.
"Haystacks". Cardboard, oil. Size h.
-"Outskirts". Cardboard, oil. Size 24.H.5.
Both works are written on primed art cardboard. On the reverse only jammed stamps 1953 (?) or 1958 (?).
Work under the glass, which is a little glare.
Ask your opinions.
Spasibo@
Normal picture sketch plan. At first light I don't understand everything: the sun shines on the right, and shadows, at least from the stack, no. Perhaps the author used the sketch to the final painting, and remember, where the light, it may be just an error. In short, in light of my question. Second job(if brief) written from a very high point. Perhaps the author wanted to show the beauty of the sky? In my opinion - it wasn't very successful.