I. E. Krachkovsky
 

Good day to all)
In the house lives 12 years work, bought late husband - who don't know.. On the hands is an act of artistic expertise of the Institute of Restoration. Picture researched and UV-rays, and under the microscope.
Now there was a need to sell it.
Have carefully examined your forum with relevant topics. Presented here signature Krachkovsky differ..
Pulled from the frame - also doubt..
Help?) The new examination will be expensive, I would like to understand whether you want to spend money..)
Work wanted to sell.

The work is very similar picture Kryzhitsky K. I.. the truth always makes it look)

[QUOTE=P_Anna;3290431]Good day to all)
In the house lives 12 years work, bought late husband - who don't know.. On the hands is an act of artistic expertise of the Institute of Restoration. Picture researched and UV-rays, and under the microscope.
Now there was a need to sell it.
Have carefully examined your forum with relevant topics. Presented here signature Krachkovsky differ..
Pulled from the frame - also doubt..
Help?) The new examination will be expensive, I would like to understand whether you want to spend money..)
Work wanted Pragati@

So you and the expert show. What they found in UV rays, and under the microscope."?

[QUOTE="P_Anna;3290431"]'d like to understand whether you want to spend Dengi@
If we hope that You have a job Krachkovsky Joseph Yevstaphevich, you do not need. Yes and take her on attribution, immediately wrapped with the words "@2,@he[/I]".

Heard Thank you:) I put it mildly...not an expert;
just was curious, in what ways are like "work"...
I will enjoy the next)

Carpe diem - "live in the present".

Seriously, with the seal of personnel on "expertise" is awkward painting to sell would be.

[QUOTE=СергейСпб;3290541]Carpe diem - "live in the present".

If you don't, with the seal of personnel on "expertise" is awkward painting to sell was by@

Because of this, and asked for help in this "history" was confused a lot, and examination was made to be expected, if..
Alas.
I admire the creativity unknown to me author..) Thanks!

P_Anna, I would suggest You to first show it to an expert opinion in Gasnier and find out it's a genuine paper or not. In 1998 miracles were all sorts. If they are from this examination will disown, and then a picture anywhere to carry is not necessary.

AllenaI Think there is no sense even to go.. On the back of this conclusion glued a photo of a picture. Just yesterday, I managed, finally, for the first time in 12 years to study and to compare their elements; and a picture released from the frame.. Mismatches in details, the lot..
In the attachment is the photo from the signing.
I guess it was done, but at some stage, the picture changed. There and cardboard no, but only the canvas pasted on the canvas!
Husband bought it through a person who never made me trust) So-called, "art dealer"..

P_Anna, well, if so, it is really not worth powder and shot.

Allena, do You think that an experienced expert, at least visually, will be able to determine the approximate age of the canvas?
It...same old, if I'm not mistaken, and already clearly understand that way of aging a lot. Something to learn..

P_AnnaAt the picture of that photo expertise lack of trees, and in the picture they are. It is strange that wanted to make a copy of such explicit details have not considered

lip21, exactly..I were taking pictures, thinking that from the flash during the examination of thin trees on the right are gone, but no.
Else drawn land on the slope in the center of the picture.
And this could not fail to notice expert, still working in the restoration center.

Sabanet and in that place the same - and the picture Kryzhitsky, and on my.
Drew, using it only a little otdalin the horizon..
And studied both artists have one master - Klodt.

P_Anna, experienced a lot of things can by eye to determine:) I honestly don't understand why anyone took so much work and manipulation of the picture to fit it to the existing strange expertise, plus a strange signature emphasised. Some obscure race that have no apparent purpose (selling paintings as Krachkovsky it is not, because all together too dull).
P_Anna, if You really want to understand what it is, you have to start all over from scratch. You can examine and painting, and paper, but all this idle idle talk. Although sometimes to share their findings and to hear someone else's opinion is also very nice. In order unhurried discussion to come up with a lot of versions about the authorship; moreover, you can even spend the whole art-historical investigation based on the fact that we have 2 images of the same places, and at different times of the year.
The purpose of all this? Nice to chat? This is the one. But if all the same goal -- to find the truth (and You, apparently, really want it:)), let the experts look for in a expert institution.