Not R. Falk...
 

As You work?

If Falk, and in this thread it would not be bad to place ,skull, after all :)
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...b5%d0%bf%d0%b0

milevafull porn!

I don't think so!

Falk...
 

"mileva, full porn!"
__________________
George, not porn, it is worse...

sergey7, well, that's about...does the work, and I love it...

[QUOTE=sergey7;3278421]"mileva, full porn!"
__________________
George, not porn, huge@

I wonder on what basis such a diagnosis?
Every sensible fan art it is clear that the work to Robert Rafailovich Falk has nothing.
On artprice registered not less than 30 artists with the name Falk. And a little-known and not considered of Falicov in a couple of times more.
What is it with porn?

But the signature is then copies it Robert Rafaelita.
Therefore, it is not one of the "little-known falkow", and, to put it mildly, fake famous R. Falk. And very inferior:confused:

redbor, below the reference signature Falk with artprica.
What is not very likely.
As signed, this is the most that is not a typical signature, calligraphy, for Europe, +/- 1900.

The signature at work - typically-recognizable for Falk R. R. in this case, looks like it is deliberately provocative.

PS: Maybe red brought someone to bad thoughts/actions;), but rather, just some "other" Falk (painting weak, and the signature "solid").

Do, plz clear photo and signature.

sergejnowo, with all due respect, I am very surprised your such a message. :confused: Falk far more signatures than you find in artpricе..
Now, just in case. signature Falk, quite frequently.

I even didn't realize it was Falk Robert Rafailovich.
Painting not even close his signature "solid", optical clearly inconsistent manner on your example.
Yes, and the subject is "Not R. Falk... " :eek:

[QUOTE="sergejnowo;3278771"]I even didn't realize it was Falk Robert Rafailovich@
And no one came, even the owner of the picture. :)
But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted him...

[QUOTE="redbor;3278781"]But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted ago@

It is unlikely. Painting (given the extremely poor photo) work written in the late 19th-early 20th century, IMHO