![]() |
Hyperrealism
Вложений: 10
Hyperrealism
Hyperrealism (Hyperréalisme). Instead of abstract expressionism, which largely relied on the case, and in which the artist to express themselves through movement of the hand, and pop art, use ready-made images that he derived from advertising, came hyperrealism. As in the pop dell'arte, the use of photography in the hyper-realism is very important. Artists of this trend show scenes from daily life, portraits. To achieve their goal, they used two methods: either the projected image on the canvas using a projector and then painted, or print photos on canvas and then painted directly on the press. U.S.: Malcolm Morley - see bad painting Chuck Kloz (Chuck Close) 1940
Richard Istes (Richard Estes) 1936
Don Eddy (Don Eddy) 1944
|
Вложений: 8
Audrey Flack (Audrey Flack) 1931
Koingz Ralph (Ralph Goings) 1928
|
Вложений: 8
Robert Behtle (Robert Bechtle) 1932
John de Andrea (John De Andrea) 1941
|
Вложений: 8
Europe:
Gerhard Richter (Gerhard Richter) 1932
Franz Gertsh (Franz Gertsch) 1930
|
Вложений: 4
Antonio Lopez Garcia (Antonio López García) 1936
|
Вложений: 1
That in my opinion a brilliant example of hyper-realism:
Lily Hill "Untitled" |
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
|
I do not know I enjoyed the Austrian artist Eugene (Eugene) de Blaas pictures, but he also traced the majority of paintings with photographic accuracy. So I think that this style was founded by this artist in the late 19 th century, though he did not just hyperrealism, but "idealized hyperrealism, I would have called his style is so
|
If you do not see the difference, why pay more?
Giperrrealizm looks quite impressive, especially for the novice art lovers. Indeed, one can say what a great artist - painted as a picture! That's just why take the bread out of good professional photographers? I think that a good photographer will make this a better shot than the average, but masterovity painter. So love to draw painters who are not able to invent and create a real picture.
With the release of huge masses of Chinese and Thai artists (call them artists - hand does not rise), you can buy with quality repaint the "Photos" for ridiculous prices (100-200-300 dollars). While in Thailand, I "dug up" two paintings in this style. I drew a great master copyist. The work was saved by the fact that it was redrawn from photographs of professional photographers from the magazine "Neshenl Geografiks. A European put an interesting shot, but plodding taets (s Chinese) to repeat it. It turned out bad, but can this be considered art? In any case, they differed from the production of Thai art salons, however, and cost is relatively expensive. Perhaps the "ninth wave" products MadeInChina must put an end to this temporary destination in the art. Especially with the development of modern computer and printing equipment, which was not in the 70 -, 20 century. It is no longer necessary and paint - made the frame on a digital camera, finalized in "Photoshop", he drove the image on the large-format plotter (printer) on the canvas - what more overpay ?!... I know one of our (Soviet, Armenian or Russia), the artist, who this style have had measles in 70 years, by analogy with the Americans - Khachatryan, Carlos. He still uses a part of this style, but only as a support tool. A right to use the photo - not interesting. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=35925 |
Цитата:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...????? ???????? |
Thank you. But the fact is that a strange character at the forum has posted pictures from my collection - Solitude, type of Smolensk ... And everything else up to the portrait of Anna is in my collection, like so much else, which is not posted. I'm not offended quite as promoting good artist, even among the narrow circle of connoisseurs - always a pleasure to the author, and owner of the originals. Thank you very much, because it is stranger made me look at this site.
It's nice that you even remember Khachatryan, therefore he deserves. That's why I wrote about an artist, I am familiar. Note that the content of the forum passed the original photo is not good. It turned out badly, as I did in these photos in his time at the intermediate "shaving". |
Цитата:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...p;postcount=53 |
Find the difference!
Вложений: 3
That's about a fresh picture of Carlos Khachatryan, who had once written urgently to the show. What and left a definite imprint. In my opinion, the picture is not too successful, static, in places like the photo. Basically, the picture could be considered a category of photo-realism or hyper-realism, if only for the Armenian angel away from the left side. And no one say that the picture was written not with pictures.
Compare the two images: a fragment of the picture with the self-portrait of Carlos Khachatryan and his photograph. Which is better? Or so - that is not worse? http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=35925 |
A couple of examples of photorealism
Вложений: 2
Here are a couple examples of photorealism. Well, almost photorealism. I know that the artist painted from photographs from the magazine "Neshnel Geografiks. Purchased in early 2008 in Thailand, about. Samui $ 200 thing. Had to dig thousands of cheap canvases in art salons to choose something interesting. They cost quite expensive for the Thai painting (50-100 ve per sq.m), which is 99,9%consists of copies. There are very workshops of a good standard. Since this is a copy of the photo, I decided to buy - say, not quite a copy. There was another picture of the same master, but it was a copy of a painting by the famous western artista, because I did not spend money.
That's so - remove the name, set a price for two orders of magnitude larger, set in the middle gallery of New York - and here hyperrealism! While it is clear that very professionally built frame, as first worked western photographer. Council "new Russian": rather than spend big money on a custom portrait of Russian art - better than rest of the money a couple of weeks at best, a hotel, give color photograph of the Thai people and get results. The Council's "new Russian": rather than spend big money on and interior paintings by Russian artists and artists - a better rest of the money a couple of weeks in the best hotels, select from thousands of canvas a couple of dozen, which is suitable to you in style, color and size. Unfortunately, my advice is not suitable if you want to buy art, not craft work. But in Russia it is possible to pierce, but much more expensive. |
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 11:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.