Help evaluate the picture
 

Hello

Help rating artwork.
Size 24 * 31, was wondering about the cost and feasibility of an examination.

Looks like you have a bad copy of the portrait of Louis 13.
You can try to help out 300 dollars for it.

Like?
.......

Character somehow too modestly Costumed for the monarch, is not it?

Added after 1 minutes 52 minutes
Probably graph with refined manners

I do not find . Portrait of undress . Such were many monarchs . Dress your character is not modest .
You do better pochetche photo may uglyadite additional features, for example, drawing on the top of the scepter , the motif fabric on the sleeves .
Because you have nowhere to go - proving it . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> not convince the buyer , the price fall another two-thirds.

Have a date "II 1615"

Here this man once more on your like , and territoriality and years of life with an inscription on the frame , such as fall (though in 20 years to look like that ?)

Wladyslaw IV ( Polish: Władysław IV Waza, Belor . Uladzіslaў vase , lit . Vladislovas II Vaza) ( 9 June 1595-20 May 1648 ) - King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania on 6 February 1633 ( the proclamation of the election of November 8, 1632 ) , the eldest son Sigismund III. August 27 ( September 6 ) in 1610 , as the Russian Tsar , took the oath of the Moscow government and people.
 
Under the contract of February 4, 1610 , which was concluded at Smolensk between King Sigismund and the Moscow embassy , prince Vladislav had to take after the adoption of the Orthodox Russian throne. After deposition Basil Shuya summer 1610 Moscow government ( Semiboyarshina ) acknowledged king Wladyslaw and coined the name of " Vladislav Zhigimontovicha " coin. Vladislav Orthodoxy did not take to Moscow arrived and was crowned tsar was not . In October 1612 in Moscow was deposed government lordly Prince Wladyslaw , in 1613 the king was elected Mikhail Fedorovich. Prior to 1634 Vladislav continued to use the title of Grand Prince of Moscow

rms1980, Dear, and yet you're right!
Really very similar, thank you!

Accidentally on rablere wrote about it today and remembered your picture, please, good luck on sale!

Do the bump, as you want to hear more opinions on the authenticity, the estimated cost and feasibility of the examination of this work of art.

And what do you want from the examination?
What questions it should give the answers?

I do not know, never done it.
Probably will be installed on the results of the authenticity of the date of the analysis process?

Why do something if you do not know for what?

" Authenticity date "?
And you have created this thing?

At least establish the age of this picture.

And you and I say this without any " process analysis ".

This pattern is written in the XIX century.