Aivazovsky. In the sea at dawn.
 

Painting IK
Aivazovsky.
oil on canvas, size: 54 x 71 cm

Interesting assessment of this work.

Now how much you can actually sell?

And for how much it makes sense to buy the same picture?
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Signature density another, false.

Aivazovsky painting is not too fractional.

There are doubts in the picturesque : the sea, sky and rock many fields almost the same tone or color , no " soft " painting. These fields are no games or extra warmth - cold game. Feels like , because of this tip is just like standing cliff above the sea.
 Many stylistic repetition , for example, in the clouds. Therefore it is required to verify authorship.

I can not say about the fields and the game heat with cold,
 
but I know that this picture has an album Ivan Aivazovsky.
Large collection.
- Volume 2

Usually capital printers are known to work . Difference in the coloring can not see between the first illustration and book ? And if you see something random such a difference ?

redbor, All works reproduced in books publishing "White City" must be carefully checked.

Totally agree with you , work Aivazovsky clearly does not belong . Original paintings by Aivazovsky repeatedly exposed for sale . In July 1996, Sotheby's picture came in a private collection in Germany. In November 2005, the painting was exhibited at Christie's auction , lot number 83 , estimate 300,000 - 400,000 pounds, or 540 000 - 710 000 $ or 440 000 - 580 000. To my knowledge the last time in 2009, it was auctioned with an estimate Koller 900,000 - 1.2 million Swiss francs, which is equivalent to 590 000 - 780 000. It should be noted that the work is known by several names : " Riders on the cliff top at sunset " or "Coast of the Caucasus " , or " Marina ", the size 101h66 . A few words about the album. Album " Big collection of " how -2 abounds considerable number , to put it mildly , questionable works by Aivazovsky .

Well, actually, not all, but only of " from private collections ".

Nicholas Levenko this is probably a very different picture ? Aivazovsky , because there are similar things ?
 The picture that I show and whose image is in the album - certainly looks like you and shown on the former at the auction, but it's a different picture - riders there, but there is a second ship, and the outlines of rocks and mountains - other and etc. ..
It was signed in the left corner , and " my " - right .

Of course the other, I do not claim that this is it.
I just gave a sample of the original work by Aivazovsky.

That is, are you sure it's a fake?

But the authenticity of the painting, which was sold - was confirmed by someone?

Specify a specific expert opinion I can not. Since I do not own this picture, and on the Internet itself is not vsrechal . But we can assume that passing such auctions like Sotheby's and Christie's , this work has gained the necessary papers .

In this book, 35 percent bullshit

Let me disagree with you , Cyril .
Albums now published very casually , looking at reproductions, there are questions to galleries . Cite two examples related to the work of Aivazovsky funds TG - compare black and white postcards , published before the revolution and contemporary images of this work , published in the album. This begs the question to the State Tretyakov Gallery , " Lord , where the originals ? "

Maybe it baldeyut publishers?
I'm with my favorite A.Kiselevym same bad luck started.

Aivazovsky not there ...