Moscow landscape, identify the author
 

Help identify the author of Moscow's landscape .
Cardboard /oil , 32 x 52 cm, n /s .
Left, bottom " possessory title " "Moskau 1955 "
Shows part of the Great Stone Bridge , view from Prechistenskaya embankment towards the Kremlin .
Modern look with Google, it is a pity that the item /angle , where there was a painter, failed to catch .

What a good job straight flawless ...
But why not the author's signature, and there is only an indication of what it is ...
what is strange.

On the back of the cardboard there are no inscriptions, marks??

Search artists need in the direction of former association OST work 50s , for sure. The manner of the average , but it can be N. Shifrin , and more likely Constantine Vyalov to work - there is a chance . Look how similar in composition ( as a strictly architecture painted ) . Yes, and in the manner it is, overall . And the fact that there is no signature , so only confirm harder and authorship attitude it has not. Seen his work , as well as hundreds of other artists without it .

cardboard dry and brittle, pasted on modern plywood.

I'm afraid to peel, cardboard pricked art showered.

Thin cardboard such huh?
And is there a stamping mimics the texture of the canvas, which may have not recorded a piece of the edge or between strokes?

Yes, the thickness of about 0.8 mm, for me, is a thick wax (at least on the reverse side) paper.

Usually face glued tissue paper (sometimes several layers), and then removed, but it restorers, and so you can spoil, and all of a sudden on the back that no, there is a risk of damage, always.

Yes , I agree, looks and style to build a composition accurately and at the same time vigorously and confidence throughout. If there is a hint of texture similar to the canvas, in any case not to tear off , with this invoice always crumbled . There's a ground that " pulls " ( binder of paints ) and so there is no coupling layer with him ...
Signature can be X-rayed ?

You're right, no doubt it.

Bow to you and thank you.

yes

already know <! - ~ 4 ~ ->

oh hand to ....
<! - ~ 8 ~ ->

Added after 1 minutes
in this case is not so important - love, took on the wall.

K-Maler,
Totally agree with you , kombinatovsky cardboard is very thin, almost like paper, in the 50s wrote on it - painting is not kept , and if a little bend - much to fall off.


Basically, if your not signed to one signed easily confirm , and so may head to fool .

Your way in my humble opinion , is typical Vyalova signed with the construction , and expressive - a great stay in her left.

Yes, for this and liked the spirit, and not just on the "New Moscow", YP
looks like.

You can still gently fluff diluted gelatin (in consultation with the restorer) - about a teaspoon to half a cup, if this oil ...
And plywood to fix it is not bent.

Similarly, there is here from YP
bit, no wonder next worked in typewriters in rhythm.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->