Attantion!!! Sotheby, s 25.11.13, lot 26
 

Lord!
my outrage is no limit!
how long can you fake works under publication??
because we are not fools?
Comrades, we know you!


26

PROPERTY FROM A PRIVATE COLLECTION, USA

NIKOLAI FECHIN

1881-1955

INDIAN NECKLACE

Score 100,000 - 150,000 GBP

Добавлено через 3 минуты
and about the texture and brush strokes I do, keep quiet!

Sandro, and that you are actually so surprised?

It always has been, is and will be!

A pike in the river to fish awake!

Surprising work of experts the most respected auction house.
And the presence of this work in the main directory of Important Russian art

Esteban, sorry!

Money comes first!

Sotheby, s 25.11.13, lot 26

The best provenance can be considered as a photo of the artist in the background of his paintings . Is not it?

"Portrait of a code name The Indian Necklace is a typical example of the lines in the portrait artist , where he uses a concise portrait formula renouncing difficult angles or rich dynamics , and although his wrist while writing background is wide, but it is still considerably more restrained . And only fast , very intense color spots spotted dresses are making more relaxed scenic game. Through this arrangement of accents , as an artist focuses on the face, which in spite of defining an almost frontal pose with the point of view of a little below, has intrinsic liveliness. a young woman's character is revealed in the its bright , serious eyes. "

Galina Tuluzakova .

Serious argument.
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> But Sandro published a fragment of the photo.
I think so.

Dear Sandro.
I hope that this message will exhaust your boundless anger and allow you to save precious time for the empty correspondence with Sotheby's employees on this issue. [/QUOTE]


what in the world?
You think I can not read?

Added after 2 minutes
Jane Doe, you're talking about?

Added after 3 minutes
Vladimir Vladimirovich, thanks!
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

then, apparently, the rest should chew ...

chewed really good idea: I, for one, moreover, that "the mind is boiling outraged" of your message is not understood anything at all ...
<! - ~ 3 ~ ->

That's how it is.

For comparison photo with message number 1 and part of the photo with the message number 7.

Indeed , and what I am , Sandro?
It is better to be told that you( as made ​​contact on this forum ) mean by this :

Marassa, compare the two given me pictures look like? Well , even if similar, still you will find at least 10 differences ...
When you offer a thing , which was published a long time and b /w version, you do Dolny b /w photos of this thing and compare it to the posting , it is - the rule ! I will not explain the subtleties ... laziness

Added after 1 minutes
Jane Doe, I said above ...

You brought fragment b \\ w photo of better quality than mine ...

Added after 4 minutes
Jane Doe, and that the first time you hear about it?
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> a fake pictures under the old b /w publication, under the "unknown location" under the second, third and fourth options??

You surprise me? ...

This is a picture of the description of the lot in the auction catalog -
Literature & Catalogue Notes [/URL].

Jane Doe, There are three kinds of people: those who see , those who see when they are shown , and those who can not see .
Leonardo da Vinci
Marassa, If you carefully examine the picture and photo attached to her differences with the naked eye . With the image of the nose overdone eyes, too, shows a slightly different way than in the photo, which stands near the artist . Lips do not like ! on the invoices Feshin smears are usually more free than in the present work. And , the signature , by the way , does not bother anyone ?
Look more closely and you will see everything !

I admit my mistake.
Something I do not doglyadel.