Painting - sketch?
 

Good day!

Please help evaluate the picture.
Oil on cardboard.
35h12sm.

Thank you very much for your participation!

Добавлено через 32 минуты
What is your opinion on the level of the artist?

What is your opinion on the level of the artist?

VIA, regular study, conventional artist.
Without nuance, with the "grammatical errors".

Thank you for your attention to the topic!)))) Can anyone would vote on the approximate cost of Studies?
It is the first page ..))

At first sight tells me that the size ( right vertical then horizontal) 12h35 Set is not true. You have one vertical is less than two , horizontally, that is, if 12 then 22 then where , and if correct then respectively 19, 36 , 20, see the author is not present, painting a very average quality , look in the " Gelos " studies of similar size with which not how , but the author are 100-200 dollars and often do not find a buyer, unfortunately your sketch or whatever is , if you like - you keep it .

He made a mistake in writing, the right size 35h21sm

Once again:
........

Etude is very decent.

But the market price even without a good sketch of authorship

will be formed on the basis of the work of unknown materials +

the artist.

Well, that is
indeed 100-200 dollars

But if it turns out that this study "good" artist

all at once make out in it his dignity.

Thank you very much!
What do you think the approximate age of Studies?

Добавлено через 2 часа 1 минуту
Found on the Internet similar picture, can relate to this artist?

Found on the Internet similar picture, can apply to study this artist?

I, as an artist, I have the opinion of Prof. only on execution .
Opinion " amateur painting in general " - 1967-1982 .
If the artist studied in Moscow - most likely in the Stroganov ,
unnecessarily painting ( as a component of skill) at a very high level.

5 of exhibited works : Five - does not add up , and 3 - poslabzhe .
The rest - yes, may be, but so many wrote .
(2 and 4 work in general is very, very much)
Snap this sketch to a particular artist without additional disk imaging is unlikely. Well, maybe an expert from the Tretyakov could.

All the works belong to the painter Tretyakov Yevgeny Ivanovich (1926-2013)

" ... In 1951, he graduated from Moscow thin. Institute . Surikov. From 1960 he taught at the Moscow art director -prom . School. Kalinin . Honored Worker of Culture of the RSFSR ( 1980 ) ... "

http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/42820

In my opinion there is similarity with the sketch works by this artist

Here are some of his other paintings : http://ola-la.livejournal.com/26586.html

What can be said about the similarity of the work ?

Chances authorship of this sketch almost none. Just in case - such as the author himself recognizes his creation ( if alive ) . Or you will get a folder with a very similar things . A fair judge ( not a dreamer ) 'm not assume responsibility for no reason to call you a website . There are authors with a bright style and brushwork that persist in the sketches , but it's major artists and basically the first half of the twentieth century, and this work later. Well, guess what's the point , that's like me when it was in the artist Anurin , like him , and of other similar too . And the most important works of the examples , what is their size? I think they are larger , and your sketch - a picturesque blotches on the state , its purpose , grab motive lighting. Many artists have finished objects and sketches written in different ways.

In my opinion no.
thing for me did not impress