Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   N.N.Dubovskoy, "Moonlight on the sea." Please attribution of the painting (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=215392)

NatalyCzarnowski 06.09.2013 13:10

N.N.Dubovskoy, "Moonlight on the sea." Please attribution of the painting
 
Вложений: 4
Dubovskoy NN
"Moonlight on the Sea", 1889, oil on canvas.
size 41X 57


Rama was a receipt.

Art-ort 06.09.2013 14:56

In this case, you have to trust receipt - "HX"

NatalyCzarnowski 06.09.2013 14:58

Цитата:

Сообщение от Art-ort (Сообщение 2747431)
In this case, you have to trust receipt - "NC"

Well, that was not any doubt the authorship of this picture is given to the examination.

redbor 06.09.2013 15:07

The painting, glass chtoli?
Signature is similar, but the painting is not clear <! - ~ 10 ~ ->

You need a good photo.

NatalyCzarnowski 06.09.2013 15:08

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2747501)
painting under glass chtoli?
Signature is similar, but the painting is not clear <! - ~ 10 ~ ->


Yes, under glass.

redbor 06.09.2013 15:19

Why oil painting under glass?

Кирилл Сызранский 06.09.2013 15:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2747501)
Signature is similar

Think so?

redbor 06.09.2013 15:43

Вложений: 1
At most - signatures NN
Dubovsky - no.

But that's found on the sketch for 1886 there are similarities.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

The picture, however, doubtful, without attribution, see 10h16

but still sold to shareholders in Stockholm for 2,100 euros

Кирилл Сызранский 06.09.2013 15:54

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2747611)
There are similarities.

In my view, there is first.

Second, on the marina signature clearly presented late and hardly any author.

uriart 06.09.2013 15:57

NatalyCzarnowski, this picture is not Dubovskoy!

Here and without expertise can be seen from a mile away.

Do you want to get money for their expertise - please!

redbor 06.09.2013 17:53

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 2747621)
Second, presented at the marina signature clearly late and hardly any author.

Here I agree <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

NatalyCzarnowski 06.09.2013 21:24

Thank you all for your answers.
I'm doing the examination to confirm the authorship and authenticity, not to establish.
In authorship I'm sure because I know the history of these paintings before handing them to me.
Just need a piece of paper.

Added after 1 minutes
Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor (Сообщение 2747551)
Why oil painting under glass?

Well, not exactly under the glass I put.
so it was a long time ago.

Кирилл Сызранский 06.09.2013 21:38

Цитата:

Сообщение от NatalyCzarnowski (Сообщение 2748451)
I know the history of these paintings before handing them to me.

As you may know before buying these paintings in 1981?
Do not tell people.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

NatalyCzarnowski 06.09.2013 21:47

And then, we are all well aware that a picture has already passed the examination before selling it through a pawnshop , the receipt even have a record of what work is old . I want to thank everyone for participating in the discussion. Let's wait for an expert opinion . If you have questions or suggestions , ask the PM.

Кирилл Сызранский 06.09.2013 21:47

Цитата:

Сообщение от NatalyCzarnowski (Сообщение 2748591)
we are all well aware that a picture has already passed the examination before selling it through a pawnshop, the receipt even have a record of what work is old.

Nonsense, do not write.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 09:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot