Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Страница 1 из 2

Показывать 15 сообщений этой темы на одной странице

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)

- Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)

- - Attribution Pictures (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=214052)

Kirils

21.08.2013 15:56

Attribution Pictures

Вложений: 4

Good afternoon.
Please tell me who it is and then have dug all the literature and there is nothing I can find.
Signature is very difficult to read.
Thank you in advance for your help.

Kirils

26.08.2013 11:54

Вложений: 7

I send better photos.

Кирилл Сызранский

26.08.2013 12:03

Kirils, the picture itself is interesting, but I read the signature and failed, are seen only the first letter of the name - "E" and the names - "t. "

Some modern, I think, and maybe a little known.

goldberg

26.08.2013 13:35

pattern is seen at the end of the 19th-early 20th century, oil on canvas seems redundant

Kirils

26.08.2013 13:42

Цитата:

Сообщение от goldberg (Сообщение 2730451)

pattern is seen at the end of the 19th-early 20th century, oil on canvas seems redundant

Canvas is not duplicated 100%tested.

goldberg

26.08.2013 13:50

Цитата:

Сообщение от Kirils (Сообщение 2730491)

Canvas does not duplicated 100%tested.

Well then ... oh no old photos unimportant

Kirils

27.08.2013 11:03

Вложений: 3

Цитата:

Сообщение от goldberg (Сообщение 2730531)

Well then ... oh no old photos unimportant

Unfortunately I do not agree with you.

Добавлено через 4 минуты

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 2730151)

Kirils, the picture itself is interesting, but I read the signature and failed, are seen only the first letter of the name - "E" and the names of -
"t".

Some modern, I think, and maybe a little known.

Thanks for the help, but the picture is not modern is 100%

Kirils

27.08.2013 11:07

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 2730151)

Thanks for the help, but the picture is not modern is 100%

Кирилл Сызранский

27.08.2013 11:12

Цитата:

Сообщение от Kirils (Сообщение 2731501)

is a modern picture is not 100%

Then how to explain here this, once you say that

Цитата:

Сообщение от Kirils (Сообщение 2730491)

is not duplicated on canvas 100%tested.

Kirils

27.08.2013 11:26

[QUOTE=Cyril Syzransky; 2731521] Then how to explain here this, once you say that [/
QUOTE]

Why duplicate the canvas if it is in good condition?
But the old canvas.

Кирилл Сызранский

27.08.2013 11:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от Kirils (Сообщение 2731571)

But the old canvas.

And in the new photos.

Kirils

27.08.2013 11:46

Вложений: 4

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 2731591)

And on the new photos.

Here's proof.
Maybe with far it seems to you that it is new, and the new is not as it looks.

camertus

27.08.2013 18:08

gives the impression of highly diffuse.
why not read the signature.
great masterpiece not think so.
an interesting story.

Pecheneg

27.08.2013 20:41

Цитата:

Сообщение от camertus (Сообщение 2732121)

gives the impression of highly diffuse.
so the signature can not be read.

It is not blurred, but was in a "good" boss who is constantly wiping it with a damp cloth from such care and turned worn and unreadable signature.

camertus

27.08.2013 21:43

I think of a damp cloth, oil will not get away.
however, I want to try, has not yet decided which of their belongings

Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 03:17.

Страница 1 из 2

Показывать 15 сообщений этой темы на одной странице