A.Isachev, two paintings
 

Portrait of "Incoming", oil on canvas, 60 x 150 cm, 1978 Portrait of "Saint Paul", cardboard, oil, 28 * 32, 1970 Expert opinion on the pictures there, as well as confirmation of the authenticity of the widow A.Isacheva
.

It seems to me that this is the work of an artist no one.

Write price, please

Tatiana Sil'chenko, "head" were 1976-77 and the beginning of the 80s, and yet, judging from the sketches - most Baptist.

You do not confuse?
Signature is?

For there to be no doubt about the authenticity of the painting "St. Paul" I visited Belarus, met with the widow A.Isacheva , Natalia Nikolaevna , as well as a visit to the museum . And received a confirmation of the authenticity kartiny.Eti two paintings were donated to the family. They never and nowhere been exhibited . So I met with the widow , Isachev NN and visited the museum.

This is what we understand, and from the first message.
The dating of a strange title for the artist.

"Saint Paul" $ 10 thousand, and the "Incoming" $ 20 million.
Paintings evaluated widow Isachev NN, since it is the only owns the copyright to the pictures of her late husband.

Added after 12 minutes
Sorry, did not specify.
In 1980, "St. Paul" was presented to us, a year of writing, to my shame, I do not know.
On the picture there is no date, no signature

Copyright on the picture of her late husband did not happen!

What about copyright heirs?

We read through the eyes of a lawyer : " Blame the author's name and the integrity of the work reserved indefinitely "
Widow Isachev NN, only has the right to the protection of copyright husband.
On the right and then " copyright " , it is the only author.

I thank all of you for the necessary information for me.
All this only proves that I was on the right track to establish and confirm the author's paintings.

Your way " to establish and confirm the author's paintings " do not have to establish and confirm the author of pictures. I first became acquainted with pictures of Sasha Isachev in the early 70's in an apartment on the highway G.N.Mihaylova Revolution. Some pictures to this day remain now in the gallery of the Free Russian contemporary art , and are available for review. From your pictures a different impression . A N.N.Isacheva and does not judge , even if Isachev someone once gave some pictures.

Magnolia, you can now type on the keyboard of the computer Civil Code , read the articles of Chapter 70 Copyright
, learn all about these copyright, its objects and subjects of his inheritance, and finally did not look like a joke here.

I sometimes laugh on codes , and on projects even more so. And what you advise.

Take, for housing . First legalized lawlessness opportunity to fleece the population , then a freebie raped by millions, and now " identify and fight ." And to respect the writing. There maybe more than lapses in school notebooks.
Just think about the difference have copyright and guard it.

I have nothing to think , there is the Civil Code, it is written .

Article 1283 of the Civil Code contains a provision that the exclusive right to work inherited.
 With the adoption of such a right by inheritance heir or heirs become owners in respect of works of a deceased author. They are free to use it in any manner not inconsistent with law . Passes to the heirs the right to give permission to others to use the work , which passed by inheritance, they can generally prohibit its use by anyone . Use of the product without such permission is a violation of the exclusive copyright.