Landscape. Help in the attribution
 

Good afternoon.

Here is a picture as the canvas and stretcher - a very old, the origin of the post-war.
Signature I do not inspired by, maybe someone familiar?

Thank you in advance)

Spiridonov?

Micah.
Spiridonov.
Obviously, Michael.

Only not this.

Thank you. It was the first suggestion , I thought that's the side of this here : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Спиридо..._Spiridonovich
However , the signature does not have anything even close to do with people's artist of Chuvashia. And the way is also not very adequate.
Mikhail Spiridonov - Google knows only about the one who mentioned Cyril in the previous message ...

Threat . The photo is hard to see , over the signature of dating, and most of all to read : 901
ZZY . The post-war origins: it means that the existing of things seems to be known after the war, before that - no. Perhaps , somewhere brought from the front.

The author of your landscape, Moses Spiridonov, of course.

Approximately 90x60.

Came in an exchange of Borisovny Tatiana Alexandrova.

Accordingly, the "floated" in Moscow

It's clear.


This work is the beginning of the twentieth century.


In my opinion, on the whole, the artist - Private-trained.

And even some soulful, a follower Savrasova, you might even say.

Or 961 edinichka where it disappeared with time <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Since I mentioned Spiridonov Moses Spiridonovicha here's an example
his work
http://artmus.culture21.ru/ppage.asp...te=AD&s_page=1

there by the way this site has more parachka Spiridonov , but I did not compare their work

This writing is not worth it.



P.S.
On the other hand, you still had 904 messages and you like gibberish - Guru!

What do you say ? Really? This is for you gurus measured by the number and the message Read More#, but for me it is secondary.
There was hard to see 901 or 961 , respectively, year or in 1901 or 1961 , and that this nonsense? Just do not write nonsense type for this is not important in 1901 or 1961 .

And that's what you have written, do not write worth it. Because , as I charge in pursuit of some sort of mythical points , and this is a pure lie ! If it is in your power can reset my counter on Communications and my thanks , though not so much , let your will add to it if you will warm the soul <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

1961 date of writing under consideration scenery can not be.

I think your ranking in other units, and to write, a year of writing may be shown pictures of 1961 - this is nonsense!

Thanks Cyril, I have carefully read the topic and how much understood , the work of the early twentieth and do not argue, just saying that seen bad. And on this , and you said that the author can not be Moses Spiridonov as at 1901 it was only 11 years old . It seems to me that you already know the answer to ownership, a share?