2 theatrical sketch
 

Help in the attribution 2x theatrical sketches unknown author, perhaps forum users will be able to identify who it is ..

Originate from the archive Dobuzhinskiy son , and were in the same folder with 2 other sketches Serge Ivanov.

The signature on the two are reading as J Glusky? tried to search for information , but unfortunately, did not advance .

That you have purchased at a recent auction in Tours?

Glasha, yes that's right!
and that it is something influences?

In general , it affects the provenance (positively ) your sketches .

Just wanted to say it was a good (!) On this auction , and especially - from the archives of Rostislav Dobuzhinskiy .
I then excitedly attributed the Russian pair of sketches from the early 20th (the French are sometimes very interesting to sell )), but to me they have not got - a few days of sadness .... <! - ~ 1 ~ -> .
Tried to buy on the internet, in Tours, did not go , so " these two " did not see - in the catalog were not, in the lot just a photo of two sketches of Serge Ivanov ( well, I liked ) , but " these two " interesting - it makes sense understand.

The authorship personally, I do not say anything . There was a Russian artist and set designer abroad - Glinski , but his name was Nicholas. On these kind of different initial. By the way, clearly visible - make a better picture captions , maybe this will advance the search.

The author
themes [/URL] also in the sale were a few papers by Glinski.

I also liked.


igorr,

It makes sense to wait until the forum will go Sim.
Or contact her at l /n

There, in my opinion, not initial, but just a tick in front of the word.

And read (or rather not chitaetssya) as a set of bukaf: Gludxy.

Maybe it's all the character's name, not the artist's signature ...

Sim Now , as far as I know , too busy Pts . important works . But I guess it makes sense to wait.

In any case , we need clear pictures sign /label to make sure that there is (Glusky _ Gludxy _ Glinsky).


Interestingly , thank you. And what about N.Glinskom is, and images of his work there , are rare (or rather , I did not come across ) .)
(and how kruzhavchiki- then spelled out on the skirt to the one with the rake .. < ! - ~ 1 ~ -> )

Yes, there was a lot of fun. And maybe you were upset because Annenkov ? <! - ~ 1 ~ - > though I did not like the idea of ​​selling them all one by one. as a result of a single archive was carried off in pieces , and some items were not PRODANOV .. nemnozhno strange approach .


I, too, there is something determined attributed the ! there were a few interesting things. e.g. one character .

As for Ivanov , the sketches in hand was better than the picture . The only problem provenance . We , you and I know that he is " out " , but no
evidence of this in the hands of none. there are just 2 work. as a result can only refer to a specific sale at the auction, but no more.
Now here's another thought , there is both a sketch on a dark gray paper .. whether they should try to restore something , to give a fresh new look , or so it is better to leave ..

Concerning Glinski .. Thanks for the tip ! looked , at this time he was living in Sofia .. and special footnotes to his familiarity with Dobuzhinsky I have found. alternative course
possible , who knows ..

Seyschas 'll post another photo captions

Добавлено через 7 минут
came out here like pochetche

came out here like pochetche

You can ask for a link to the auction.
Thanks in advance.

Please:



only:

Cette annonce de vente n'existe pas ou plus.


But there were contacts:

LIEU DE VENTE Maître ROUILLAC et ROUILLAC 22, Boulevard Béranger 37000 Tours

Contact:

Tél.
: 02 47 61 22 22

Fax: 02 54 77 61 10

rouillac@rouillac.com


This auction was:

11 mars à 14.00

Добавлено через 24 минуты
And because of him (much) too - there is no need to attribute it all clear, but the "hot Bublichki" three days later in a head spinning (Вложение 1933221).


Absolutely agree with you - like experienced already mentioned my auction archive Lifar, and it sold out 8 hours without a break - and it's the same thing for the museum archives! a lot of material about Diaghilev and other ballet productions of the first half of the 20th century.
And just like a human's sad to see how it all fell apart and flowed, carefully collected.
In my view, in this case more sense to buy out the entire archive, rather than even the same collection of Rostropovich, sorry.


No, why should I? there is a special tinted paper (medium wave), which is used by artists to effectively work with white and darker


Perhaps, of course - they were almost the same age: Rostislav Dobuzhinskii, 1903 born, and Nicholas Benoit, born in 1901 - Went to school together and were friends for life; Nicholas Glinski also born in 1901, also engaged in the same business.

And because of him (much) too - there is no need to attribute it all clear, but the "hot Bublichki" three days later in a head spinning (<! - ~ 1 ~ ->).


Absolutely agree with you - like experienced already mentioned my auction archive Lifar, and it sold out 8 hours without a break - and it's the same thing for the museum archives! a lot of material about Diaghilev and other ballet productions of the first half of the 20th century.
And just like a human's sad to see how it all fell apart and flowed, carefully collected.
In my view, in this case more sense to buy out the entire archive, rather than even the same collection of Rostropovich, sorry.


No, why should I? there is a special tinted paper (medium wave), which is used by artists to effectively work with white and darker.


Perhaps, of course - they were almost the same age: Rostislav Dobuzhinskii, 1903 born, and Nicholas Benoit, born in 1901 - Went to school together and were friends for life; Nicholas Glinski also born in 1901, also engaged in the same business.

Bublichki say Glasha, but enlighten. with them, I just do not understand. As the inscription "Bublichki" of the song refers to the figure? and then could not find a connection between these two things. although the decoration was of course no question.

Lifar catalog I've seen, but they missed the auction. There have been many Goncharova. You managed to buy something? If so, congratulations, provenance there is certainly better. must have been "hot"? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

OK.

Maybe so. wait maybe someone else would vote, more knowledgeable .. but I think sooner or later, will deal with them. Figures good ..

And I?
Me too, please!